X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Original-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:mail-followup-to:references :mime-version:content-type:content-disposition :content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=7h2YP/NbnGOuTokchEg7FDSXoMKaXuxO2sa8/ElV4K8=; b=NwL3lWhgy3/bOauu+2yRBW2fN0MuYFlKLGOSWmXVxWhK68ToLLK4a5CaFMYAnVe3cV j5Zn/z0zCKW015dluZAzO9qtd836AQHsUiQqwuknemkUpuUGyr8ZR8zL6wuwCGYjJQX2 Fne5ftH2021I2cJ3z1C8jG2sxBTBXvDYiUs7FrdQmSBpFAw64OlAau/m9ts/pXixKi7I qm1db8dWMTHk0TR+rBC6xkeCFlAnxA9OGvFPyW+y5vj3hBBc91y9W/QBDYKaTbOmc7Ft PcE5jWHNmSwCrZkV0S8xvd4fWOF2ni4fjEMpcBEft/XmUV9oIEcVa0Qk6tq40+XdKseG uaGw== X-Received: by 10.112.155.232 with SMTP id vz8mr1836563lbb.20.1445206014902; Sun, 18 Oct 2015 15:06:54 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2015 01:06:52 +0300 From: "Vladimir Zhbanov (vzhbanov AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" To: gEDA users mailing list Subject: Re: [geda-user] A lesson from gnet-makefile Message-ID: <20151018220652.GC2782@localhost.localdomain> Mail-Followup-To: gEDA users mailing list References: <4D3CD563-D8EE-4B2A-975A-AC2B573960FF AT noqsi DOT com> <34B17816-9EA5-45FD-BFB4-9D623A8D3D87 AT noqsi DOT com> <39FF6208-7D45-4DE8-9AEE-1ED1B512705B AT noqsi DOT com> <35916A94-24B8-4AF4-86E2-36F3E8111EAE AT noqsi DOT com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 03:54:17AM +0000, Evan Foss (evanfoss AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com] wrote: ... > > I think things would be easier now if the original gnetlist > > implementation had been entirely in Scheme. It’s pretty good, but > > its limitations stem from the clumsiness of the C/Guile FFI. > > All that would do is make you the only developer. I believe you're wrong here. Cheers, Vladimir