X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Original-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=UMFIfHr+CZhJlHDKr7eJX5tuNw6p4F/7wIndjxg/jNo=; b=iFNLnJR4kyTlDa00HLozRDSMU96JQPq5ocfz/ILerwnz7O/ku4dWHbxYogC4OO6R66 cJjdFkZ9Qwkvwnmf7e6rhzUOv1ZLJpv61r+WhfCslGs745PRTL0sGK9T274iE2TLM9m0 OBcbsz7gyuhIeT6BQsdqxIpRcwo6cRsSrJdyuUnVHU6OywI8UT1lRnA69hgJ6vYHPtPG wI0I6IZx6gRgQLj+/u6tqZqYYWaVq3Ij47g2jnm/0xg+O6lVEzUBnyKTzCst+XomAusT Cvk5GGdN0No+O6IomJTF9kPnHRuCFLdFPYcjJLxa//wmw9Xu5HcVDmSurIjVdK6/nlKu IJ5g== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.112.134.73 with SMTP id pi9mr293492lbb.83.1444791541038; Tue, 13 Oct 2015 19:59:01 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <1042003D-82E2-40F0-AB60-8186580C46AD AT noqsi DOT com> <201510121905 DOT t9CJ5T9W026297 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <88EA58F5-2B23-498A-9E5B-84054976DBED AT noqsi DOT com> <4D3CD563-D8EE-4B2A-975A-AC2B573960FF AT noqsi DOT com> <34B17816-9EA5-45FD-BFB4-9D623A8D3D87 AT noqsi DOT com> <39FF6208-7D45-4DE8-9AEE-1ED1B512705B AT noqsi DOT com> <201510140229 DOT t9E2T45e021346 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2015 02:59:00 +0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [geda-user] A lesson from gnet-makefile From: "Evan Foss (evanfoss AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" To: gEDA users mailing list Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id t9E2x5KH026675 Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 2:56 AM, Evan Foss wrote: > On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 2:47 AM, John Doty wrote: >> >> On Oct 13, 2015, at 8:29 PM, DJ Delorie wrote: >> >>> >>>> No, I assume that you don't know what might break the tools. >>> >>> Please don't assume the worst of people. >>> >> >> I don’t. I do assume that good people will make blunders. This is completely normal. I’ve made enough of them. Minimizing the opportunities for blunders is important. > > Yet you talk like it would doom the suite when in reality it could > just be fixed. > > Old workflows using the flat nets already have userbase that gets > priority in conflicts. The new nets have no users and we can change > them after an unstable release with out harming anyone's work. I > thought that was the point of unstable releases, branches and etc. I feel like this point right here is 1. Something we all assumed would be resolved in the way I described 2. Possibly deserving of it's own thread in case I am wrong about 1 >> John Doty Noqsi Aerospace, Ltd. >> http://www.noqsi.com/ >> jpd AT noqsi DOT com >> >> > > > > -- > Home > http://evanfoss.googlepages.com/ > Work > http://forge.abcd.harvard.edu/gf/project/epl_engineering/wiki/ -- Home http://evanfoss.googlepages.com/ Work http://forge.abcd.harvard.edu/gf/project/epl_engineering/wiki/