X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-TCPREMOTEIP: 207.224.51.38 X-Authenticated-UID: jpd AT noqsi DOT com Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_1E3DA8F8-F764-402D-A93C-C3BD420F6D5F"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha512 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\)) Subject: Re: [geda-user] A lesson from gnet-makefile X-Pgp-Agent: GPGMail 2.5.2 From: John Doty In-Reply-To: Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2015 20:25:57 -0600 Message-Id: References: <1042003D-82E2-40F0-AB60-8186580C46AD AT noqsi DOT com> <201510121905 DOT t9CJ5T9W026297 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <88EA58F5-2B23-498A-9E5B-84054976DBED AT noqsi DOT com> <4D3CD563-D8EE-4B2A-975A-AC2B573960FF AT noqsi DOT com> <34B17816-9EA5-45FD-BFB4-9D623A8D3D87 AT noqsi DOT com> <39FF6208-7D45-4DE8-9AEE-1ED1B512705B AT noqsi DOT com> To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.6) Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk --Apple-Mail=_1E3DA8F8-F764-402D-A93C-C3BD420F6D5F Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 On Oct 13, 2015, at 8:01 PM, Evan Foss (evanfoss AT gmail DOT com) [via = geda-user AT delorie DOT com] wrote: >=20 > You assume I am going to be like a bull in a china cabinet. No, I assume that you don=92t know what might break the tools. I am = confident in this, because I don=92t know of anybody who uses the full = breadth of geda-gaf. So nobody really knows what might break them. > I > deliberately declined to have direct commit privileges. If my code is > going to the mainline it will I expect have to get a review. Given how > open we are to other peoples ideas here getting past that will ensure > a level of quality no lower than any previous work. >=20 > For my contributions I will be glad to write tests of them. We should > have a larger regression testing framework though. >=20 >> Despite Peter Brett=92s great work, we simply don=92t have the tests = necessary to insure that changes to the core don=92t affect somebody=92s = flow. >=20 > It depends on how people choose to use what I want to add. It simply > being there is not going to break flows. In the core, it might. Features interact. But a plug-in that isn=92t = plugged in is perfectly safe. > Everywhere the original flat model exists people should have the > option of the new one. The key word being *option*. I am not about to > try to remove the old s_conn stuff just build something else next to > it. Why can=92t you do this in Scheme? Or in Python with Xorn? John Doty Noqsi Aerospace, Ltd. http://www.noqsi.com/ jpd AT noqsi DOT com --Apple-Mail=_1E3DA8F8-F764-402D-A93C-C3BD420F6D5F Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Comment: GPGTools - https://gpgtools.org iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJWHb01AAoJEF1Aj/0UKykRcncP/3jgHldAnt6rO9Dz38OKwGGZ S4M/yT4QF1HBFn51uYTyAQWwl31BhC0CvSIvl+FXxSWgSrhFEifuDnZAboTscgfD pJ85LAonNZqL+blUsE+PdsrCYJ0ilZvBEGgyohH4wOtpcRQjK5Cm/F1I/BhTQ77S 4si24GoVzOxM6ePT9XJ1h6jNBVDnVxJMxR/3nVG0E6ODdfiGbbssOtJklhPX1bNz oSVOci5MtU8fACGzD0nvLTGGlvWZcTdjZQvyfXg9TytMMPekT74HtyP7gfOl7K8A XqNfO2Rb3fif0njwODR/p5rpPjXfVwlxEF9WCjoFg2llHlh7TRy6hf4o73dh/kcB INCLNBPqr0kuiyQ1aiZ/XB4NoDQmOCBIs9+ZWIJd9s1AiQ0zOgBt+irCG3zImydy xKxL5bnuwzJYXPN/IOrqZuObwGUUsYXvchB3qyGlzt66DcA3CrIUhG/j0VL9ZThn qHs/ruAJE29jwuuAFS5wb2Qi6rKreGd1XdN+/aKOogK92yzL/Cx3RtlSwcRcJeOs FeJqga3ztjK68523pcdV6OGkC9Cx+5P58XJwM1JSfMfgajqmo2zrXQtEgV4yOstB iQHQfCxiN0QrBGM23RuM3yJ4TuZU8bfgWimABpd6WaUmLesTxFBqUnBlTo9NhUEi BwFpCPN9eQkv7AaJDMJk =CyBS -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Apple-Mail=_1E3DA8F8-F764-402D-A93C-C3BD420F6D5F--