X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Message-ID: <20151013010012.3652.qmail@stuge.se>
Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2015 03:00:12 +0200
From: "Peter Stuge (peter AT stuge DOT se) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: [geda-user] A lesson from gnet-makefile
Mail-Followup-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
References: <1042003D-82E2-40F0-AB60-8186580C46AD AT noqsi DOT com> <201510121905 DOT t9CJ5T9W026297 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <CAM2RGhTMnybSnYgnNhVZGA6PTvyJu+=Kzd5LX2HMqxT1F4LoRg AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <88EA58F5-2B23-498A-9E5B-84054976DBED AT noqsi DOT com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="b1ERR0FXR0PvNIRE"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <88EA58F5-2B23-498A-9E5B-84054976DBED@noqsi.com>
Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk


--b1ERR0FXR0PvNIRE
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline

John Doty wrote:
> What we need is knowledge of layout programs that *can* handle this
> sort of extra data. Without tools to export to, what good is it?

It's good because it is a specification for where tools which can't
handle the data can/should aim in the future.

It's even better if the data model is proven, but it's not impossible
to create a solid data model without any implementation at all.


//Peter

--b1ERR0FXR0PvNIRE
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFWHFechR3Q0dhIfEgRAjPdAKCKIBpBz+/a+/k8TuzmRgRL1Hc0LwCfbHu7
Pg/s7EKwhqQ15cpq/tbGaVo=
=iwF6
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--b1ERR0FXR0PvNIRE--