X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Original-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=AoMdWEPBkwfJSiFd6M+WeyTIzeW8zWycb91ue09t8go=; b=k2aHd+NFtSQJxlWpwBf3A1u5ao3QX/9yvTA5qkmSKDC5T0smYM5ahaHVEIFELIPwaJ E0LIcvIpi8Q+AB6IDiLRowpfHt+M2OtL8GKW15E0GryheORzJTIbGsgwD6f4mtvl0McR jve7qLc/sSkv9waXVoIxAVoS36t5iRQXMilZiECt+3prxz9v6Hlt9YoJy2g2yXFFqH2d iNVVDHqlhFtq+xislDCfGRbX7NiUstX97sN/6pezWFPQuxvRmOoIxFHR0BV9ebvLX0rn dqcDDtelFk4oKPJA1sukOVYiRQwMOap2qA3GAyf3cVSSHz4/AvxfoQjcTGV7t+TU4pL1 eLlQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.180.11.37 with SMTP id n5mr16110111wib.20.1444691883834; Mon, 12 Oct 2015 16:18:03 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <201510120350.t9C3oRRX017140@envy.delorie.com> References: <201510112355 DOT t9BNtiIU030187 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <201510120350 DOT t9C3oRRX017140 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2015 15:18:03 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [geda-user] making DRC less misleading in the presence of shorts, non-routed rats, etc. From: "Britton Kerin (britton DOT kerin AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11c25b488bc4df0521f08aeb Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk --001a11c25b488bc4df0521f08aeb Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On Sun, Oct 11, 2015 at 7:50 PM, DJ Delorie wrote: > > > Fine. If it's confirmed that experienced users have actually ordered > > shorted boards from this I'll add it. > > Well, I built a board with an unrouted trace once... does that count? ;-) > If it was definitely because of the silence of DRC window that's the sort of fail case that would justify more effort. > > Otherwise I'm going to stick with my experience + laziness as guide > > and call it good the way it is, since I still think the problem is > > entirely for new users not yet used to the flow. > > "Good enough" is good enough :-) > I think so also for now at least --001a11c25b488bc4df0521f08aeb Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable


On Sun, Oct 11, 2015 at 7:50 PM, DJ Delorie <dj AT delorie DOT com> wrote:

> Fine.=C2=A0 If it's confirmed that experienced users have actually= ordered
> shorted boards from this I'll add it.

Well, I built a board with an unrouted trace once... does that count= ?=C2=A0 =C2=A0;-)

If it was = definitely because of the silence of DRC window that's the sort of
fail case that would justify more effort.
=C2=A0=
> Otherwise I'm going to stick with my experience + laziness as guid= e
> and call it good the way it is, since I still think the problem is
> entirely for new users not yet used to the flow.

"Good enough" is good enough :-)

I think = so also for now at least

--001a11c25b488bc4df0521f08aeb--