X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Message-ID: <20151012185617.8377.qmail@stuge.se> Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2015 20:56:17 +0200 From: "Peter Stuge (peter AT stuge DOT se) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Subject: Re: [geda-user] A lesson from gnet-makefile Mail-Followup-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com References: <1042003D-82E2-40F0-AB60-8186580C46AD AT noqsi DOT com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <1042003D-82E2-40F0-AB60-8186580C46AD@noqsi.com> Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk John Doty wrote: > suppose instead that we had a pin attribute that said > “this pin may draw three amps”. .. > Suppose a resistor had an attribute that meant > “100 ohm shunt terminator”. Imagine a component with a pair of > pins identified by an attribute as a differential input. > Put them on the same pair of nets, and the netlister could deduce > that the pair is a balanced transmission line and the the resistor > needs to be close to the input. Yes! I think it should go even further though, to also specifying the impedance for the component pin pair. I also imagine presets, possibly with multiple parameters, allowing to say simply "High-speed USB" , "10Mbps EIA-422" or "PCIe 1x" for a given pair. //Peter