X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com From: Kai-Martin Knaak Subject: Re: [geda-user] GTK3, Glade interface designer (router, auto?) Date: Sun, 11 Oct 2015 00:59:04 +0200 Lines: 32 Message-ID: References: <20151003210701 DOT de392b925f54dadb0a5fedd8 AT gmail DOT com> <56104A0A DOT 9020507 AT xs4all DOT nl> <1443909591 DOT 1873 DOT 18 DOT camel AT ssalewski DOT de> <1443975731 DOT 671 DOT 52 DOT camel AT ssalewski DOT de> <20151004191717 DOT bf8223417541a9306bfbd9ea AT gmail DOT com> <1443997480 DOT 2068 DOT 32 DOT camel AT ssalewski DOT de> <1444070851 DOT 1014 DOT 20 DOT camel AT ssalewski DOT de> <56133047 DOT 7030402 AT neurotica DOT com> <56133CC4 DOT 7000306 AT neurotica DOT com> <56137585 DOT 2030004 AT jump-ing DOT de> <201510061806 DOT t96I6tUG026305 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <56142095 DOT 8030800 AT jump-ing DOT de> <201510080301 DOT t9831weq018628 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <201510100314 DOT t9A3EDGS018665 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit X-Complaints-To: usenet AT ger DOT gmane DOT org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: a89-182-176-22.net-htp.de User-Agent: KNode/4.14.1 Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com DJ Delorie wrote: > >> He presented his project as "a _proper_ fork" (underline in the >> original). > > So... you're arguing over how proper a proper fork is? No. >> > It's no different than every git branch we create being a "fork" >> > that may or may not get merged, other than irrelevent mechanics >> > and probabilities. >> >> Igor consistently declares to have no intentions to merge his >> changes back to main line geda. Creators of feature branches >> typically are motivated by the prospect to have their feature >> merged. To me this represents the difference between a fork and a >> temporary side step. > > That would be "irrelevent mechanics and probabilities". > > You're arguing over what words mean All of the above is about intentions (rather than words) > Please don't. I will not go into meta mode