X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Message-ID: <20151008024147.4736.qmail@stuge.se> Date: Thu, 8 Oct 2015 04:41:47 +0200 From: "Peter Stuge (peter AT stuge DOT se) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Subject: Re: [geda-user] GTK3, Glade interface designer (router, auto?) Mail-Followup-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com References: <20151004191717 DOT bf8223417541a9306bfbd9ea AT gmail DOT com> <1443997480 DOT 2068 DOT 32 DOT camel AT ssalewski DOT de> <1444070851 DOT 1014 DOT 20 DOT camel AT ssalewski DOT de> <20151007135719 DOT 10977 DOT qmail AT stuge DOT se> <20151007161001 DOT 21379 DOT qmail AT stuge DOT se> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk Kai-Martin Knaak wrote: > what if the full user base is not that much larger than the > subscriber list of the mailing list? Partly serious. Are there > any hints to realistic estimates? There's no way to know. There are lots of circumstantial metrics like number of downloads, but then there are mirrors and so on. Nothing good. > > Many on the list are big users, but all big users are not on the > > list. > > It is the classical "silent majority" conundrum. There is no way to > know what the silent majority is up to. Any argument which refers to > what the silent majority wants or does not want is inherently weak. Yes that's exactly my point. With open source it's not really possible to know what "most" want, because you never know who "all" are. I think the only reasonable thing to do is to work on what you want yourself, and possibly listen to what others say that they want if you're feeling generous with your spare time. :) //Peter