X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Original-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :content-type;
        bh=aNyHmO4KwNaWxZ0p2xzppWfuCp/KkNqozUwLwgAKhyg=;
        b=mCUhdd3ZkNcZ+ykQw9jhoHHZM+UxUjGIihdGV+28LHjHOzhEXmJ3BDtCuEHrLLmvQy
         Xcn8AUTHefwZk6JunZEHRohCReh8UHchDZJtXx/+m2653e8cVV6uOjNFS2CWNcaZHESY
         n2j14zJSudy3CHaOyTm5p8+Bc+SH4bZwmgDRLyWYwubsso8hrLRK+dRaRGqKkGq3c4SV
         I6ZTRvTYSfEhEDizuAElrnKm6VsoV4nC7+eUJoQ3Ufqdxkgut/bpWpOveNyg/T6ArQnH
         c9ajsFjGhK44NxFC4dQWhUqLyDe4YPbH+vDt8zyPYzY/pHIM/a4PSPPuJbJF6U7C42GV
         v/vg==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.25.209.80 with SMTP id i77mr1441794lfg.92.1444269534412;
 Wed, 07 Oct 2015 18:58:54 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <20151007230801.GB22847@localhost.localdomain>
References: <CAC4O8c_g7e562Gaotrbi6gLfjP6cJU1ys=MtEkDE7bSh4F9dfg AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<1443975731 DOT 671 DOT 52 DOT camel AT ssalewski DOT de>
	<20151004191717 DOT bf8223417541a9306bfbd9ea AT gmail DOT com>
	<CAC4O8c9Bi5HJfcW6wUgm_+4O2gs4vDdBMbS2hF_0dCqnBuJahQ AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<1443997480 DOT 2068 DOT 32 DOT camel AT ssalewski DOT de>
	<CAC4O8c-bnGky=Nab59-pOTJkB8Q9Tc5t5hqE+dnEF-777hUjMg AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<1444070851 DOT 1014 DOT 20 DOT camel AT ssalewski DOT de>
	<muv4ua$hat$1 AT ger DOT gmane DOT org>
	<alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 00 DOT 1510060356440 DOT 7137 AT igor2priv>
	<56133047 DOT 7030402 AT neurotica DOT com>
	<20151007230801 DOT GB22847 AT localhost DOT localdomain>
Date: Thu, 8 Oct 2015 01:58:54 +0000
Message-ID: <CAM2RGhTXF6xaFVzFpcMvTLV11t_8Et7GobmXqpvsvpaLADgv=Q@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [geda-user] GTK3, Glade interface designer (router, auto?)
From: "Evan Foss (evanfoss AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
To: gEDA users mailing list <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

On Wed, Oct 7, 2015 at 11:08 PM, Vladimir Zhbanov (vzhbanov AT gmail DOT com)
[via geda-user AT delorie DOT com] <geda-user AT delorie DOT com> wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 05, 2015 at 10:21:59PM -0400, Dave McGuire (mcguire AT neurotica DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com] wrote:
>> On 10/05/2015 10:03 PM, gedau AT igor2 DOT repo DOT hu wrote:
>> > I recommend the same process to happen for pcb and gschem. If there's
>> > literally noone who has the time and will to sit down and code push &
>> > shove, it just won't happen, no matter how formally you vote. On the
>> > other hand if you ignore what the user base wants, you end up with dead
>> > ends like guile/scheme in gschem.
>>
>>   *sigh*
> *sigh* (\me too)

To me having 2 releases (one stable & one unstable) a year is ideal.
Too many makes me worry that bugs will creep in and break my actually
work in some way. I think externally it looks better to have a steady
predictable release cycle than a fast one.


-- 
Home
http://evanfoss.googlepages.com/
Work
http://forge.abcd.harvard.edu/gf/project/epl_engineering/wiki/