X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Original-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:mail-followup-to:references :mime-version:content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to :user-agent; bh=T5IXhutwhx2yY7WeJsJSe8jldoui4BeTx3ogb3uJqFI=; b=APO7ERWyFrgL+5VbYVUYtq+iNZHcu2AJsCO9lH8Eblw2ux62k9m2WzewRZ6Xa0Z3K2 ru3gw1dSClRNMqSeU1dwZadtJBz+VEFwPhcHEYHQzthOo4ZZsreBD3gfsInf5iZlqs8Z Ds5qRkSBtqLM9fuPi8KxtUf9bNDv2qAzzQZiqnLZwlRbj4wvCB0sWLc6Ur6Cm3wL+D6W GNp4B+OWMX5iFwnnRCWFlIuuS6pm9wnx/fKk+TeT9LVbHmntjyBYsAZB9y3Wd+4Kx4ZI d3IEWGqkQmpzc8g4vpmA1KaozocBl+3W1peo8Xe7e+pNgjsxe6ejHD/g9/zGJsuwWLGH e6FA== X-Received: by 10.25.218.205 with SMTP id r196mr1271179lfg.82.1444259284097; Wed, 07 Oct 2015 16:08:04 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 8 Oct 2015 02:08:01 +0300 From: "Vladimir Zhbanov (vzhbanov AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Subject: Re: [geda-user] GTK3, Glade interface designer (router, auto?) Message-ID: <20151007230801.GB22847@localhost.localdomain> Mail-Followup-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com References: <1443975731 DOT 671 DOT 52 DOT camel AT ssalewski DOT de> <20151004191717 DOT bf8223417541a9306bfbd9ea AT gmail DOT com> <1443997480 DOT 2068 DOT 32 DOT camel AT ssalewski DOT de> <1444070851 DOT 1014 DOT 20 DOT camel AT ssalewski DOT de> <56133047 DOT 7030402 AT neurotica DOT com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <56133047.7030402@neurotica.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk On Mon, Oct 05, 2015 at 10:21:59PM -0400, Dave McGuire (mcguire AT neurotica DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com] wrote: > On 10/05/2015 10:03 PM, gedau AT igor2 DOT repo DOT hu wrote: > > I recommend the same process to happen for pcb and gschem. If there's > > literally noone who has the time and will to sit down and code push & > > shove, it just won't happen, no matter how formally you vote. On the > > other hand if you ignore what the user base wants, you end up with dead > > ends like guile/scheme in gschem. > > *sigh* *sigh* (\me too)