X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Original-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=63i/aQmWdjwfxIbHLLSANXneRAoAsluaypuaV7aQRVA=; b=G8YOAfVIbHC46wN095404PyXlFlfXZ59O+/8n3v3c3avpOC+s/N5fn8IVa5Ai87xh7 54VqHwe3f56AVfeP21IAx0OkEQGDst1NRmT4+4NysxiE2PtbF3F+CKYU7HAq0rbiffXV ixeid8Ly9zMpBqVLnhBadX02VeMVqOsoXKnGJhXQjnD9shEAeMhBB8gwGn0W8j74kcIG DI9Q+j1r5pWmygtb9YeGABxWWazEY7tLbJmB52GVWE3rblncNZuLcZPYfeanopIWSRDG dUKs25ap9Z49h7OrI5DRQUmD6sqUvlk8jpdN2vcoUgwaH6ahxjlqh2wHhjVkMZGfDFkL cppw== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.112.63.67 with SMTP id e3mr1200265lbs.92.1444237496156; Wed, 07 Oct 2015 10:04:56 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20151007165659.25199.qmail@stuge.se> References: <5BF9C4DF-32C7-4C06-9F96-8F82C935254E AT sbcglobal DOT net> <560EAEE1 DOT 6020701 AT jump-ing DOT de> <3E72AC35-5862-41B9-A8FD-6804E89E9FFB AT sbcglobal DOT net> <20151003210144 DOT GA21262 AT localhost DOT localdomain> <56104E16 DOT 3050006 AT jump-ing DOT de> <20151003222928 DOT GC4287 AT localhost DOT localdomain> <20151007134152 DOT 9597 DOT qmail AT stuge DOT se> <201510071637 DOT t97Gbcqr019027 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <20151007165659 DOT 25199 DOT qmail AT stuge DOT se> Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2015 13:04:56 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [geda-user] Toolkits From: "Evan Foss (evanfoss AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" To: gEDA users mailing list Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk On Wed, Oct 7, 2015 at 12:56 PM, Peter Stuge (peter AT stuge DOT se) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com] wrote: > DJ Delorie wrote: >> > Essentially you're saying that you would like a toolkit with a >> > lifetime of "forever" >> >> You mean like Motif? :-) > > That's a great example. The world moved on and Motif now "feels" > outdated. I'm sure it's perfectly fine though! I would actually like it if gschem had a motif GUI. > For me it is less available and more strange than gtk, only because > I'm more used to gtk. > > I guess gtk is the reason we use cairo and pango more now? They bring > some significant benefits, and so we also have indirect benefits from > using a new product, which may not have been obvious when starting a > gtk2 hid. > > > //Peter -- Home http://evanfoss.googlepages.com/ Work http://forge.abcd.harvard.edu/gf/project/epl_engineering/wiki/