X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Message-ID: <20151007134152.9597.qmail@stuge.se> Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2015 15:41:51 +0200 From: "Peter Stuge (peter AT stuge DOT se) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Subject: Re: [geda-user] Stop playing stupid political games with gEDA Mail-Followup-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com References: <201510020041 DOT t920fM6o031268 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <560DE183 DOT 4060305 AT jump-ing DOT de> <5BF9C4DF-32C7-4C06-9F96-8F82C935254E AT sbcglobal DOT net> <560EAEE1 DOT 6020701 AT jump-ing DOT de> <3E72AC35-5862-41B9-A8FD-6804E89E9FFB AT sbcglobal DOT net> <20151003210144 DOT GA21262 AT localhost DOT localdomain> <56104E16 DOT 3050006 AT jump-ing DOT de> <20151003222928 DOT GC4287 AT localhost DOT localdomain> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk gedau AT igor2 DOT repo DOT hu wrote: > Yes, I think GTK is a bad idea long term (for any application) Essentially you're saying that you would like a toolkit with a lifetime of "forever" - which I can understand, but I also think it is a bit unreasonable. The world changes and our software will need to change with it. Not much, but some, every now and then. We can be the most lazy if we have clever interfaces in the right places. The PCB hid abstraction might well be just that. Yes, implementation may diverge if there isn't a lot of development going on, that's OK, life goes on. > For my own amusement I'm working on a small UI toolkit based on SDL2. That's a large project. > It'll take a long time to finish the toolkit, tho. Yes. Did you look into fltk and solvespace? //Peter