X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2015 13:28:50 +0200 (CEST) X-X-Sender: igor2 AT igor2priv To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Debug: to=geda-user AT delorie DOT com from="gedau AT igor2 DOT repo DOT hu" From: gedau AT igor2 DOT repo DOT hu Subject: Re: [geda-user] GTK3, Glade interface designer (router, auto?) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: <20151003210701 DOT de392b925f54dadb0a5fedd8 AT gmail DOT com> <56104A0A DOT 9020507 AT xs4all DOT nl> <1443909591 DOT 1873 DOT 18 DOT camel AT ssalewski DOT de> <1443975731 DOT 671 DOT 52 DOT camel AT ssalewski DOT de> <20151004191717 DOT bf8223417541a9306bfbd9ea AT gmail DOT com> <1443997480 DOT 2068 DOT 32 DOT camel AT ssalewski DOT de> <1444070851 DOT 1014 DOT 20 DOT camel AT ssalewski DOT de> <56133047 DOT 7030402 AT neurotica DOT com> <56133CC4 DOT 7000306 AT neurotica DOT com> <56137585 DOT 2030004 AT jump-ing DOT de> <201510061806 DOT t96I6tUG026305 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <56142095 DOT 8030800 AT jump-ing DOT de> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (DEB 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk On Wed, 7 Oct 2015, Kai-Martin Knaak wrote: > gedau AT igor2 DOT repo DOT hu wrote: > >>> If you prefer bugs fixed not only using a different bug tracker, but in >>> an entire code fork, please join Igor2, Peter Clifton, Stefan Salewski, >>> ... oh, wait, all these people don't want to join anybody. Too bad. >> >> That is a lie. > > Can we agree to calm the tone down a little bit, please? I would like to. But a lie is a lie, I can't help it. You would respond too, if I said things like "Kai-Martin wants the windows port of gschem die". If I did such false statements repeatedly, wouldn't you start calling them lies? > >> I love to work in team and I'm open to join teams. When I have a project >> set up I am open to anyone joining it. I did not attempt join the >> official geda team because I felt like they were doing things in the >> wrong way. > > Well, seen from a distance, this is just what Markus wrote. You did not > feel like joining the "official geda team". You sure have your reasons. > And you surely are not alone. There is no need to feel insulted. Nope, he literally wrote: "don't want to join anybody" Please read again; it's not "don't want to join the geda team". > > >> I still think both the management and a lot of coding aspects >> are going in the wrong way. It's my personal opinion. I don't want to >> change their ways, > > There is an alternative consequence: Namely the desire to actually change > the way the project is run. IMHO, both positions have their merits. Let's > not call out each other on this. I did not. He had a claim what my opinion/intentionsare which I confuted with describing my actual opinion/intentions. He answered by repeating his claim. > > >> but I don't want the better way not to happen, so I >> made a _proper_ fork. > > While you technically forked the code. You still did not go all the way. > That would have included complete separation of website, communication I do have a completly separate website. I did publish the URL. > channels and mailing list, wiki, library-site, and whatnot. Instead, you Until there are enough users, there's no need to set up a mailing list. I don't have a wiki, not because I'm using geda's wiki but because I don't feel the need to have a wiki for the project at all. I do have a separate library. It does have a website too. I did publish the URL. > still mess with the rest of us here in regular geda-user. I do not mess with anyone. Since pcb-rnd is compatible with pcb, I regard it as a relative of the geda effort and I think the geda-user list is appropriate place to discuss it. Precendents show this sort of things are happening all the time on the list, there are a lot of tools that are not officially part of the geda suite but they are so closely related that people just use this list to discuss them. > > This sends ambiguous messages. But it is totally ok, too. Just accept that Ambiguous message like what? I tried to make my intentions clear, if you still have doubts, feel free to ask. > not everybody may cheer for your way. And after all, there are vastly more > than one way to do things. No need to get emotional about. I do accept that. I don't accept when someone is misrepresenting my opinion/words. I do not get emotional about it, but I do respond and tell my actual opinion. > > >> About my project not open to other people joining: > > Hmm. I did not see anyone say anything about this direction. Again, he said "all these people don't want to join anybody". I take joining is bidiretional: I join an existing group or if I am already in a group, others may join. If I didn't want to join anybody, I would have closed down my group so noone could join it (== I didn't need to join them in the same group). I just wanted to make it clear that I am open in both directions and to make sure there's no room for misinterpreting my intention about joining in any direction. Regards, Igor2