X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Envelope-From: paubert AT iram DOT es Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2015 08:21:32 +0200 From: "Gabriel Paubert (paubert AT iram DOT es) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" To: "Evan Foss (evanfoss AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" Subject: Re: [geda-user] Stop playing stupid political games with gEDA Message-ID: <20151007062132.GA6429@visitor2.iram.es> References: <560EAEE1 DOT 6020701 AT jump-ing DOT de> <3E72AC35-5862-41B9-A8FD-6804E89E9FFB AT sbcglobal DOT net> <20151003210144 DOT GA21262 AT localhost DOT localdomain> <56104E16 DOT 3050006 AT jump-ing DOT de> <20151003222928 DOT GC4287 AT localhost DOT localdomain> <20151004105653 DOT GA2691 AT localhost DOT localdomain> <829F83E0-9518-4E48-8DE2-6D66FC0A4217 AT sbcglobal DOT net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-Spamina-Bogosity: Unsure X-Spamina-Spam-Score: -2.9 (--) X-Spamina-Spam-Report: Content analysis details: (-2.9 points) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP 0.0 URIBL_BLOCKED ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more information. [URIs: delorie.com] -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0031] Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk On Wed, Oct 07, 2015 at 02:54:31AM +0000, Evan Foss (evanfoss AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com] wrote: > On Tue, Oct 6, 2015 at 10:13 PM, Edward Hennessy > (ehennes AT sbcglobal DOT net) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com] > wrote: > > > >> On Oct 4, 2015, at 2:42 PM, Britton Kerin (britton DOT kerin AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com] wrote: > >> > >> Sure. I'd like toporouter and a design library visible on the web much better than Gtk3 support. However, I agree that if gtk3 support is the only thing a given contributor wants to work on, they should do so. > > > > UI enhancements are my interest. Using a gschem=>PADS workflow, the gschem UI usability is more important to me. > > Someone other than Doty using gschem with out PCB. I knew there were > more out there! Officialy there is one person at my workplace only working on designing PCB, the trouble is that she is overloaded and 1500km away at the headquarters so I've only been allowed to have 1 pcb designed by her in the last decade. There will hopefully be another one in a few months. But I've written a backend to generate netlists for CadStar. A bit specific since it also has internal conventions... I actually enjoyed writing some scheme for a change. Gabriel