X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Envelope-From: paubert AT iram DOT es Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2015 17:14:22 +0200 From: "Gabriel Paubert (paubert AT iram DOT es) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Subject: Re: [geda-user] Clutterless user interface or even more custom special super features? Message-ID: <20151005151422.GA29508@visitor2.iram.es> References: <56100AF8 DOT 4090802 AT jump-ing DOT de> <20151005072529 DOT GA26068 AT visitor2 DOT iram DOT es> <201510051501 DOT t95F1VIU019439 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <201510051501.t95F1VIU019439@envy.delorie.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-Spamina-Bogosity: Unsure X-Spamina-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) X-Spamina-Spam-Report: Content analysis details: (-1.0 points) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -0.0 BAYES_40 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 20 to 40% [score: 0.2498] Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk On Mon, Oct 05, 2015 at 11:01:31AM -0400, DJ Delorie wrote: > > > I agree with your points but I dislike the new naming, many poor choices > > in PCB may be due to the first author being not being a native english > > speaker (element among them). > > Um, "lock names" et al was my choice, and I'm definitely a native > english speaker... In this case you tried to be a bit too terse IMO. Gabriel