X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f Date: Fri, 2 Oct 2015 14:58:41 -0400 Message-Id: <201510021858.t92IwflE019323@envy.delorie.com> From: DJ Delorie To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com In-reply-to: (geda-user AT delorie DOT com) Subject: Re: [geda-user] Stop playing stupid political games with gEDA References: <0788cca443ca40a88d6e21f1a216a759 AT net2air DOT co> <560D81CE DOT 1010800 AT jump-ing DOT de> <201510012211 DOT t91MBXPI025587 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <560DB972 DOT 30203 AT jump-ing DOT de> <201510012306 DOT t91N6MXc027775 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <3705430D-86F7-45ED-AB09-4F9F737C8000 AT sbcglobal DOT net> <201510020536 DOT t925a5PK017417 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <20151002103552 DOT 26610 DOT qmail AT stuge DOT se> Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com > +1. John Doty has afterall pretty well demonstrated that his skin > is thick enough if you have something mean to say about him it can > go on a public list :) It's not about saying something mean, it's about saying something private. Like a home address or medical condition. A closed private mailing list in this case is no different than manally typing in a list of addresses, except it's a lot more convenient and reliable. Also, a common case of a private discussion in gcc-land is that the steering committee never discusses new maintainers in public. Privacy allows them to be candid amongs themselves, and prevents others from commenting when they shouldn't. After they discuss, they make a unified decision public. This is generally recognized as "the right way" as it ensures that the people who are empowered to make the decisions can make the decisions, and the people who are not empowered to do so cannot influence the results. (much like a jury trial, where the jurists discuss in private and announce a single result). And John's name is spelled "Doty" :-)