X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Original-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=SQ6td6oz2vXVm+2glPthP1HZhsXmXlcmPgZS9cXeB+g=; b=vdAnTPqqt8JSaiZfmz+sOPuPyaSJ1+u9Ij8UQIfbUfRTaocrtIqo65gbhBve7ldVoB sHz7FInvn+sddBVN/Kprs8uY4kfCzGNYCDGiOSKvhqRn/c/9d8x/DohaSJjCmv5Senom COjOFkx7o7Pq7B0YIFi+th2IbMpCj+adzkGzbh3D474gmJ+86bw52cznNTmS6r/3FR4O JlRaXql0DLz8YtjSJufEh/lW6MuTDCEbeIAYzOd8loc0OpuYmtvUgCQdz3YtEoZiEaMA G4+P6i+dPvx+UqJrTNku2HVZIY4LCDbpQaVDFLYQ9roX3SaYaoILyWO8DZim4GrB2guY IQcA== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.112.64.72 with SMTP id m8mr6186736lbs.41.1443811679594; Fri, 02 Oct 2015 11:47:59 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <0788cca443ca40a88d6e21f1a216a759 AT net2air DOT co> <560D81CE DOT 1010800 AT jump-ing DOT de> <201510012211 DOT t91MBXPI025587 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <560DB972 DOT 30203 AT jump-ing DOT de> <201510012306 DOT t91N6MXc027775 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <3705430D-86F7-45ED-AB09-4F9F737C8000 AT sbcglobal DOT net> <201510020536 DOT t925a5PK017417 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <20151002103552 DOT 26610 DOT qmail AT stuge DOT se> Date: Fri, 2 Oct 2015 14:47:59 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [geda-user] Stop playing stupid political games with gEDA From: "Evan Foss (evanfoss AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" To: gEDA users mailing list Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk On Fri, Oct 2, 2015 at 2:00 PM, Britton Kerin (britton DOT kerin AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com] wrote: > > > On Fri, Oct 2, 2015 at 2:35 AM, Peter Stuge (peter AT stuge DOT se) [via > geda-user AT delorie DOT com] wrote: >> >> > There are some topics that are too trivial to warrant scrutiny >> > (minor server issues) and some that should not be public for >> > privacy issues ("people problems"). >> >> I think neither of those belong on a mailing list. > > > +1. John Dotty has afterall pretty well demonstrated that his skin is thick > enough > if you have something mean to say about him it can go on a public list :) > 1. I actually find John to be constructive a fair part of the time. 2. There are a lot of people here who are IMHO just as problematic if not more so. -- Home http://evanfoss.googlepages.com/ Work http://forge.abcd.harvard.edu/gf/project/epl_engineering/wiki/