X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Original-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=caKeFZsRdyV/Xy9Pr9/hEMrmhZW0U4OPoacYRGnYeGI=; b=BARpdDRdUj4HgTQs8qXoNSbuh1IV0eSEzC2UXxUi4ej3PsnuOTYfOcET5lep1D1D9q HaGHlcxdsVQ/79gJ1G2IsluU+1GwLpvQmyq9oeyp6jMtoX0j/NZExNUkr4wS8PrgKdcp PyzmTAF7aBFCSquAz/ILJdY7ky2h3iJAnv9ThJpXDmFre6W5L8DDEukrjzMQIsDYUw6n Sp0BPFjDKQHElPT7H+Q0gLH4NVWcnZBTJRbzgi5iIxmczCi95ofqBeVRVYMx2XACxrjD LFxQyPIMZRtPjQYKdm9TNx5P0le1CDcYlQv9M3TYZ6bEMO4MvuBbvqhnT+ads8O7mWW5 J4Gg== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.112.147.232 with SMTP id tn8mr2392898lbb.84.1443751033144; Thu, 01 Oct 2015 18:57:13 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <560DE183.4060305@jump-ing.de> References: <0788cca443ca40a88d6e21f1a216a759 AT net2air DOT co> <560D81CE DOT 1010800 AT jump-ing DOT de> <201510012211 DOT t91MBXPI025587 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <560DB972 DOT 30203 AT jump-ing DOT de> <201510012306 DOT t91N6MXc027775 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <560DCC35 DOT 9010505 AT jump-ing DOT de> <201510020041 DOT t920fM6o031268 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <560DE183 DOT 4060305 AT jump-ing DOT de> Date: Fri, 2 Oct 2015 01:57:13 +0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [geda-user] Re: Stop playing stupid political games with gEDA From: "Evan Foss (evanfoss AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" To: gEDA users mailing list Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk On Fri, Oct 2, 2015 at 1:44 AM, Markus Hitter (mah AT jump-ing DOT de) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com] wrote: > Am 02.10.2015 um 02:41 schrieb DJ Delorie: > > [... will answer the snipped part tomorrow, it's 3 AM here ...] > > >> In what way do the existing pcb and geda-gaf groups discourage >> contributors or deny contributions? > > That's indeed the question. Now you have both, a closed team existing > for years, zero membership gain in the last five years, coding almost > halted except for gschem. And you have another team, gaining 5 members > in 10 days and just as many substantial code contributions (not counting > mine) in that time. > > Compare yourself! That is a good point. > >> in that >> you need to replicate their purpose (bug tracking) elsewhere? > > The bug tracker is a unified one for all of gEDA. Not very obvious, > because so far almost only pcb bugs were added there, but that's the plan. > > >> And if they *are* deficient, why aren't you proposing instead to fix >> them? > > I wrote this repeatedly already. At the risk of sounding like a broken > record: I tried, and was shown the door. The same happened to many others. I really did not feel the love and Igor2 forked off at that point. (yes I have been saving the "forked off" pun for a while) > With gEDAhead this problem is gone. gEDAhead welcomes everybody. 50 > members are good, 100 are better and when it reaches the 1000, corcs > will pop. > > > Markus > > -- > - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - > Dipl. Ing. (FH) Markus Hitter > http://www.jump-ing.de/ -- Home http://evanfoss.googlepages.com/ Work http://forge.abcd.harvard.edu/gf/project/epl_engineering/wiki/