X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Original-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=5XHkjw7c6JYiEEsJpaSTJGOE3cmJV1GqNi6NxShRzuc=; b=rkNnEyFWVvRnme/Wn6ZUlsphwD7tGKr2k4ZQZ5ZzeL1qNW0LFFRezgt8wXl+3/K9G4 e0NVJUlzSB0VEF25EKzCpKjIIwUIXHHUeBWyv6FEDaMRl7Qu218l+ji6eIyotvH2dku8 Ob4cP3ML1sRhqv0jhPzXrPbmLmzhDVEBHfpejlNZToT7lZYGBHLTU0t7lzNtY3gfICzS HCfjCvmZWZPSuN28KORaOZeRK3jxoOlJLEHUazty57mgEXQCZe3PcDBFYftNxN3Mpwt9 6FuCGFpLZu+LLWHcZtF5N6qjph8ZEsFKovYyDTcGVUtMGXA/f7PGVUOjA+WHYPHVwKob /7bg== X-Received: by 10.194.110.37 with SMTP id hx5mr13417900wjb.149.1443304379209; Sat, 26 Sep 2015 14:52:59 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sat, 26 Sep 2015 23:52:57 +0200 From: "Nicklas Karlsson (nicklas DOT karlsson17 AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Subject: Re: [geda-user] Apollon the technical thread Message-Id: <20150926235257.d272cf98f31c7b3712e003a9@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: References: <20150921225908 DOT 480bde74 AT jive DOT levalinux DOT org> <201509220522 DOT t8M5M6WF010656 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <20150922065143 DOT GA25726 AT visitor2 DOT iram DOT es> <1442935680 DOT 677 DOT 19 DOT camel AT ssalewski DOT de> <1442940597 DOT 677 DOT 26 DOT camel AT ssalewski DOT de> <20150923111450 DOT b4fe9adbe8096fd7918ceb27 AT gmail DOT com> <20150923100641 DOT GA1049 AT visitor2 DOT iram DOT es> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.5.0beta1 (GTK+ 2.24.25; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id t8QLr6cX022910 Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk > > Design rules: for example my PCB manufacturer wants minimal silk screen > > of 0.15mm, but for the copper I have choice of 0.15, 0.125, 0.1mm > > > Same here. > This is a common use case for different design rules on different layers. > A less common but still happening occurrence is extra thick copper for > inner layers. These inner layers need to obey larger minimum spacing rules > than regular 35 µm on the outside. > > A redesign of the file format should allow for this kind of diversity. One more agree.