X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Original-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=KYV/y3XtTiDX9n1pSEUonMZCn+Cp9F2en8gBNQ4EQkY=; b=xf1ggNwePHTfTE1I817e2rhwPOxRyxH3qnEaNr1IxFGCp470JK+yLGrTOV7Q0vEDRd QDj/clmeaAXuIyLom8CDv0PAWMgHCBy9stSkHltbHVk8rIOROLjq6oiJA8F9P9l41CCN y06AeFlMzXXf+IqPfPptKx0V6fjkxGZkwmvIebcjeshMim7w2haNbg0O+MvdGeQL99Wc TgXCkjVbE+WSC9aI+vEeu+jlsJn42D21VI3w9Us0cZWK6CXoTC+aJBIBXfp4i5VCcMuY vi6i+WFHFnIuxW1QRBXqHKuvWDzRvLeubKMfpIeYsIbW1f9jPNSc7uny7rHheME6Cy/J tdnQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.180.39.193 with SMTP id r1mr5977530wik.57.1443045522229; Wed, 23 Sep 2015 14:58:42 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <56018A8B.6010000@jump-ing.de> References: <20150917043146 DOT GA1837 AT localhost DOT localdomain> <20150917142035 DOT GA5896 AT localhost DOT localdomain> <56018A8B DOT 6010000 AT jump-ing DOT de> Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2015 13:58:41 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [Geda-developers] PLEASE STOP !!! - Re: [geda-user] Apollon From: "Britton Kerin (britton DOT kerin AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11c2b930bf4e7705207137ed Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk --001a11c2b930bf4e7705207137ed Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 9:06 AM, Markus Hitter (mah AT jump-ing DOT de) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com] wrote: > Am 22.09.2015 um 18:10 schrieb Roland Lutz: > > there are basically two options: merge everything, or decline > > everything. I'm not a fan of either. > > Only the "accept everything" of these two allows natural selection: may > the better one win. Disk space isn't an issue these days, so there's no > problem to have five tools doing the same, as long as lazy people > (newbies!) get their job done. > > > Until now, I don't > > know of a single person who actually tried the Xorn netlister, and only > > of one person who looked at the code. If you ask me, that's the core > > problem with gEDA development right now. > > That's not a gEDA problem, that's a general problem. People currently > have an extremely strong tendency to rewrite everything from scratch > instead of looking at and improving what's already there. As you did > yourself. > > With everybody trying to rewrite from scratch, who's left to review all > this written code? Right: nobody. The only chance to get Xorn reception > is to enhance the experience of users. Like fewer clicks for newbie-type > users, like more options for experts, like solving problems which were > unresolvable before. Seen in this light, Xorn is only 50% finished so far. > People aren't going to try scripting interfaces and the like until the next time they need them. Months or years for many users in other words. Interactive features may get tried right away. Given the number of people on this list it may be a while before you hear reports from the trenches on stuff like xorn. Britton --001a11c2b930bf4e7705207137ed Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable


On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 9:06 AM, Markus Hitter (mah AT jump-ing DOT de) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com] <geda-user AT delorie DOT com> w= rote:
Am 22.09.2015 um 1= 8:10 schrieb Roland Lutz:
> there are basically two options: merge everything, or decline
> everything.=C2=A0 I'm not a fan of either.

Only the "accept everything" of these two allows natural s= election: may
the better one win. Disk space isn't an issue these days, so there'= s no
problem to have five tools doing the same, as long as lazy people
(newbies!) get their job done.

> Until now, I don't
> know of a single person who actually tried the Xorn netlister, and onl= y
> of one person who looked at the code.=C2=A0 If you ask me, that's = the core
> problem with gEDA development right now.

That's not a gEDA problem, that's a general problem. People = currently
have an extremely strong tendency to rewrite everything from scratch
instead of looking at and improving what's already there. As you did yourself.

With everybody trying to rewrite from scratch, who's left to review all=
this written code? Right: nobody. The only chance to get Xorn reception
is to enhance the experience of users. Like fewer clicks for newbie-type users, like more options for experts, like solving problems which were
unresolvable before. Seen in this light, Xorn is only 50% finished so far.<= br>

People aren't going to t= ry scripting interfaces and the like until the next time they need them.=C2= =A0 Months or years for many users in other words.
Int= eractive features may get tried right away.=C2=A0 Given the number of peopl= e on this list it may be a while before you hear reports from the trenches = on stuff like xorn.

Britton<= /div>
=C2=A0
--001a11c2b930bf4e7705207137ed--