X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-TCPREMOTEIP: 207.224.51.38
X-Authenticated-UID: jpd AT noqsi DOT com
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_000C3D32-19BE-4EC2-AC57-20586B310A0F"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha512
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\))
Subject: Re: [Geda-developers] PLEASE STOP !!! - Re: [geda-user] Apollon
X-Pgp-Agent: GPGMail 2.5.1
From: John Doty <jpd AT noqsi DOT com>
In-Reply-To: <56018A8B.6010000@jump-ing.de>
Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2015 11:38:44 -0600
Message-Id: <945CF17D-0840-4208-90D4-DA423B7E7133@noqsi.com>
References: <CAM2RGhTbgUfGJZacRUQ=3VBAKtd0F7OV37oRZFVjHR4A9XecnA AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <20150917043146 DOT GA1837 AT localhost DOT localdomain> <alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 11 DOT 1509171124330 DOT 3828 AT nimbus> <20150917142035 DOT GA5896 AT localhost DOT localdomain> <alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 11 DOT 1509221658000 DOT 1461 AT newt> <56018A8B DOT 6010000 AT jump-ing DOT de>
To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.6)
Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk


--Apple-Mail=_000C3D32-19BE-4EC2-AC57-20586B310A0F
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset=windows-1252


On Sep 22, 2015, at 11:06 AM, Markus Hitter (mah AT jump-ing DOT de) [via =
geda-user AT delorie DOT com] <geda-user AT delorie DOT com> wrote:

> That's not a gEDA problem, that's a general problem. People currently
> have an extremely strong tendency to rewrite everything from scratch
> instead of looking at and improving what's already there. As you did
> yourself.

But that=92s a valid, safe approach. Gschem and gnetlist are old, =
complex programs that nevertheless have great flexibility. No individual =
user or developer really understands all of their capabilities. The =
potential for inadvertent  harm when modifying them is great. I used to =
spar with Peter Brett, but I have to give him credit for the great care =
he took when refactoring geda-gaf code.

The other safe approach is optional add-ons. Scheme scripts, symbol =
creation tools, attribute editors, etc. Harmless: if incompatible with =
your flow, don=92t use them. But we need a lot of scrutiny for changes =
in code that=92s common to all flows.

John Doty              Noqsi Aerospace, Ltd.
http://www.noqsi.com/
jpd AT noqsi DOT com



--Apple-Mail=_000C3D32-19BE-4EC2-AC57-20586B310A0F
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: attachment;
	filename=signature.asc
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature;
	name=signature.asc
Content-Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Comment: GPGTools - https://gpgtools.org
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=ZyUw
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--Apple-Mail=_000C3D32-19BE-4EC2-AC57-20586B310A0F--