X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Original-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=qBdWxaF+WppjRjKyPnugtQIH1Gh3he7PsRK2k0Gd1c4=; b=akBzaKN+dqoQDXS+2HoPdBCmalRbDk1SwNezG0iR0GylVKYqcMI97DlUruP22Op7i3 N1cWXfhX+JM5PBorfSFbXIe6cB0KnQ7wRO0/nKDqOsDmdZ/V8OADM82mmovfYP7vWBS5 yQBW47Q4QlM2gOOfnVYxXMLlbLZrKXKBNUkBwXRmyj1JRwqLoQsZcK9kr3E84jIceud7 3yE9+kz7gNLeRZ/uoXNRTAySaLJ3FQTzcr8YGIbUlljA4UdnOMzuZcM9KC83AvoBNwXI NxHbDxRTkepkRYVqDi45+STkm8IFhnUQ39D/Fa665dhOJhj+9+cKxn3ZucUY3LzllUXZ EC0Q== X-Received: by 10.194.103.130 with SMTP id fw2mr34675389wjb.121.1442942893743; Tue, 22 Sep 2015 10:28:13 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2015 19:28:12 +0200 From: "Nicklas Karlsson (nicklas DOT karlsson17 AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Subject: Re: [Geda-developers] PLEASE STOP !!! - Re: [geda-user] Apollon Message-Id: <20150922192812.4b5faecfeb7b942630b28a3c@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <56018A8B.6010000@jump-ing.de> References: <20150917043146 DOT GA1837 AT localhost DOT localdomain> <20150917142035 DOT GA5896 AT localhost DOT localdomain> <56018A8B DOT 6010000 AT jump-ing DOT de> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.5.0beta1 (GTK+ 2.24.25; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk > > Until now, I don't > > know of a single person who actually tried the Xorn netlister, and only > > of one person who looked at the code. If you ask me, that's the core > > problem with gEDA development right now. > > That's not a gEDA problem, that's a general problem. People currently > have an extremely strong tendency to rewrite everything from scratch > instead of looking at and improving what's already there. As you did > yourself. I read only a little bit of you wrote but will take a look at it later as soon as I have time.