X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Original-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=ODaveRQoPqkRQwxt8iEx0GlW0ATs45sAvosY+IDaQzE=; b=xdMja+kC4QPXMi0dcXRBmDUlF11kgPOvD8uhH5r55Q9W55oZrID+I7fSt1PDwz697s kaBTadUZO7giPnRHt5N0XlseKnmQJgDPpNv+DQZ6lzrbaQLk8gD1BPVudBqlX8ofLqJh mIIpkU2991iAIBJeqocqFuoswQhpbOSmanhOluqICN3tq7ks6Vjq39cSFe4OxxIjudXA antV0ZtuKLzNGKHzvXLif3R+eY/w+MNe+UYZCJQJDLHWJ7ic0sLVhgTyTX/3iEtHtNnZ z18dyfM/M78Pa+298UyssgU6k0QxTwyNFuBKO9syRs2d83EeQQ9TKg+sRDMF4h5CrWIm 2cJg== X-Received: by 10.180.149.167 with SMTP id ub7mr3855046wib.43.1442937372088; Tue, 22 Sep 2015 08:56:12 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2015 17:56:01 +0200 From: "Nicklas Karlsson (nicklas DOT karlsson17 AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Subject: Re: [geda-user] Apollon the technical thread Message-Id: <20150922175601.a9e5017892a3cd0993c4ac64@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: References: <20150921001659 DOT 0c211170 AT jive DOT levalinux DOT org> <55FF3F4B DOT 8000406 AT jump-ing DOT de> <20150921225908 DOT 480bde74 AT jive DOT levalinux DOT org> <201509220522 DOT t8M5M6WF010656 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <20150922065143 DOT GA25726 AT visitor2 DOT iram DOT es> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.5.0beta1 (GTK+ 2.24.25; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk Yes that's conclusion I made while looking at the gerber file format for a few minutes. For gerbers I think there are macros and for pcb there are footprints. It might however be useful with different sizes but I still beleive in converting to different primitives since then drawing the layers no new drawing primitives will be introduced. > There is no need to depend on the availability of external fonts on a > particular system. I believe the lowest overhead way of doing this > would be to convert a true-type font to primitives (lines, arcs, > circles) and package it as a set of footprints in the layout database. > All that is needed is a script to convert a range of characters in a > true-type font into a library of footprints. That way, when a text > primitive is inserted into a design, the graphical editor just inserts > the converted footprints for each character. > > On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 3:30 AM, Levente (leventelist AT gmail DOT com) [via > geda-user AT delorie DOT com] wrote: > > Yes, that would be nice to have pretty fonts on the layout, and also > > arbitrary bitmap. To be honest, I don't know how to implement that when it > > comes to gerber output. > > > > Maybe with one of these? > > > > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_raster-to-vector_conversion_software > > > > Lev > > > > On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 8:51 AM, Gabriel Paubert (paubert AT iram DOT es) [via > > geda-user AT delorie DOT com] wrote: > >> > >> On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 01:22:06AM -0400, DJ Delorie wrote: > >> > "Lev (leventelist AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" > >> > wrote: > >> > > Yes, text is not yet implemented. My take on this is to use graphical > >> > > primitives, and draw texts from those, just like gEDA/pcb uses lines. > >> > > >> > If you are considering a change to how text is implemented, please > >> > seriously consider UTF8 plus TrueType (or other external fonts) rather > >> > than one hard-coded 7-bit stick-figure font. > >> > >> Seconded, but I have 2 questions: > >> > >> Is is possible to guarantee a minimal set of available fonts on any > >> system? > >> (Honestly I have no idea, I use TeX, never MSOffice or LibreOffice for > >> writing documents). > >> > >> A good library to transform UTF8 8 to vector/polygons that can be used > >> for Gerber/gcode? > >> (Maybe related to the first) > >> > >> Gabriel > >> > >