X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com From: Kai-Martin Knaak Subject: Re: PLEASE STOP !!! - Re: [geda-user] Apollon Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2015 01:36:19 +0200 Organization: Institut =?UTF-8?B?ZsO8cg==?= Quantenoptik Lines: 84 Message-ID: References: <201509132148 DOT t8DLmxI6003481 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <201509132300 DOT t8DN0sE6006134 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <7EF3E562-BC7F-4853-B90A-29726FDFEBF6 AT noqsi DOT com> <201509132319 DOT t8DNJBjC006829 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <40057B48-2FD4-4A37-A01E-9344F6C33ADF AT noqsi DOT com> <201509140138 DOT t8E1cqY1011780 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <9YS.JVf3.4bTQ}uiaVeU DOT 1LzcJP AT seznam DOT cz> <20150916121330 DOT GA2687 AT localhost DOT localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Complaints-To: usenet AT ger DOT gmane DOT org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 130.75.102.197 User-Agent: KNode/4.14.1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id t8GNalOe013549 Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Vladimir Zhbanov (vzhbanov AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com] wrote: >> 2. Not everyone who should be is on the developers list is because >> some folks wanted to play gate keeper. This killed off trolling and > Please tell me privately whom you want to see on the developer list. Decision making in private, i.e with no communication to the general public, was the way to run all things geda since at least 2009. It seems plausible, that this contributed to drive the project into the sad state which it currently is. Make people feel not involved and they tend to walk away where they feel more welcome. Note, I am not lobbying to hold general votes. The keyword above is communication. > I could not say about other developers, but my feel is I'd now more > appreciate one patch rather than hundreds of "great ideas of how to > develop further" in the list. There is a tradition to let patches bit rot on launchpad. New ideas get relegated to "plugins" "feature-branches" Back in 2009 when I was motivated to get involved in geda coding, I had to ask several times with weeks or months in between on the list to read "no time" and finally "don't like". > Some of ideas are great, however they're > lost in the flood we have on the list. Ideas need to be tossed and turned and seen from different angles before they are warranted the effort to get them into code. What turns out to be great or not so much can only be known with hindsight. There is no way to properly triage ideas in advance. BTW, I for one am very happy that this list got active after a much too long lull. > Launchpad is more convenient to > have all productive thoughts more ordered. Launchpad bug discussions lack some key properties to provide a general discussion infra structure. Most glaringly, there is no proper way to have several >> 4. Yes after an objective is set it should be migrated over to the >> developers list but I have avoided this because I think a lot of >> people there want to be left alone. > See the previous comment. Moving topics to a closed list puts those off, who are outside the gates. This may be acceptable in a situation where crowd are eager to join. However, with geda the opposite is true. The project desperately needs contributors. ---<)kaimartin(>--- -- Kai-Martin Knaak tel: +49-511-762-2895 Universität Hannover, Inst. für Quantenoptik fax: +49-511-762-2211 Welfengarten 1, 30167 Hannover http://www.iqo.uni-hannover.de GPG key: http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?search=Knaak+kmk&op=get