X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2015 15:05:22 -0400 Message-Id: <201509161905.t8GJ5MVY011855@envy.delorie.com> From: DJ Delorie To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com CC: geda-user AT delorie DOT com In-reply-to: (geda-user AT delorie DOT com) Subject: Re: [geda-user] off-topic: key bindings References: <55F5EFB6 DOT 6050809 AT ecosensory DOT com> <20150914100244 DOT 4c371d64616a1ca14f7e3912 AT gmail DOT com> <201509161753 DOT t8GHr83L007994 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <201509161846 DOT t8GIk6Dm010388 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com > Respectfully that is a little condescending to the users. They may > have come from xyz commercial suite and have bindings they like. We > don't try to tell people which workflow to use. Likewise we should > leave them to their key bindings. Our job is to make the tool great > not to save people from themselves. And likely that xyz company had a group of specialists choosing the hotkeys to maximize performance. My point wasn't "we should force them to use our bindings" it was "we shouldn't expect them to know how to set up bindings from scratch" and "we shouldn't expect the users to have to learn new keybindings just because we changed our minds" We haven't changed out keybindings because our users are used to them. PCB did add a way to change the keybindings if you wanted different ones, but we left the defaults alone. If a user wants to fiddle, they can fiddle.