X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2015 13:26:07 -0400 Message-Id: <201509161726.t8GHQ7L1006938@envy.delorie.com> From: DJ Delorie To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com In-reply-to: <55F9742B.1020808@jump-ing.de> (geda-user@delorie.com) Subject: Re: [Geda-developers] PLEASE STOP !!! - Re: [geda-user] Apollon References: <201509132319 DOT t8DNJBjC006829 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <40057B48-2FD4-4A37-A01E-9344F6C33ADF AT noqsi DOT com> <201509140138 DOT t8E1cqY1011780 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <9YS.JVf3.4bTQ}uiaVeU DOT 1LzcJP AT seznam DOT cz> <55F70229 DOT 8050800 AT xs4all DOT nl> <55F7098E DOT 9030009 AT jump-ing DOT de> <20150914191020 DOT GA3462 AT localhost DOT localdomain> <55F73639 DOT 6060605 AT jump-ing DOT de> <20150915211612 DOT GB2747 AT localhost DOT localdomain> <55F9742B DOT 1020808 AT jump-ing DOT de> Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk > >> P.S. I have given Vladimir and Ed Hennessy admin access to "gEDA > >> > Administrators". > > Good and thank you for returning to help set a path for things. > > What he didn't write, at least not in the part you cite, is that he > declined approval of the person who crafted a full gEDA weekly build And what you didn't write is that admins on that list have full control over everything gEDA. That kind of trust is not given lightly. If you ask for admin and we say no, that just means you should keep demonstrating that you're trustworthy until we change our mind. And "submitting good patches" is not an admin's job, so using that as a criteria for trust is inappropriate.