X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Original-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:mail-followup-to:references :mime-version:content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to :user-agent; bh=pG8oJtRq/CB5mNpyEcvasxYj0pCnGTJtu6Bcp37y+xY=; b=v0cbJ1KMgv2doCRlAqgbIN4Mrs0zMVZuLzHBxo71krm8Ouf8bgHyy7IDEX1HWcfCDn 0niCCLhIWC2ixsqLyforw9p258X4Hj+7mo+utr6guxIpx8yxqg7rj9u7wT+Qedz1ydtE 22Zyekdzg1S7L4EM+r2/xQYXZaNbq8ijhQT5CGbUdTERnIMUUhbcgOXkdMeRcg18aknq DnqogGVEgqGzH4oiLJdW9j3hfnh9gYHqUK1uBAlWv5iI+K20QUZcOx/pbxu9yI/RuFbL dRuXQGHuawphhIAjXsieVMV8kj+Gsde5sch7n3V/y3klOsiuNWqW7lS5owL9yjDcMPJ4 leXw== X-Received: by 10.152.9.9 with SMTP id v9mr24865277laa.111.1442358655290; Tue, 15 Sep 2015 16:10:55 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2015 02:10:53 +0300 From: "Vladimir Zhbanov (vzhbanov AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Subject: Re: [geda-user] Code of Conduct Message-ID: <20150915231053.GD2747@localhost.localdomain> Mail-Followup-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com References: <20150913003447 DOT GB16820 AT localhost DOT localdomain> <55F5BB3F DOT 3050608 AT jump-ing DOT de> <201509131831 DOT t8DIVeXi028695 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <55F5C8FC DOT 1000601 AT jump-ing DOT de> <201509132026 DOT t8DKQJf5000642 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <55F5E644 DOT 10904 AT jump-ing DOT de> <201509132211 DOT t8DMB9b4004308 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <55F7A6B0 DOT 2080404 AT xs4all DOT nl> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <55F7A6B0.2080404@xs4all.nl> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 07:03:44AM +0200, Bert Timmerman (bert DOT timmerman AT xs4all DOT nl) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com] wrote: ... > I think there is no "passive-aggressive" wording in the gEDA Code of > Conduct. > > In the Code of Conduct I only see a list of pointers to decent and pollite > behaviour, the way I would like to be treated and spoken to. > > As far as I understood, its sole purpose is to create an environment for all > participants in which they can feel safe to contribute to the best of their > ability. > > Nothing more, nothing less, no hidden agendas. > > I saw and still see no reason to discuss a template text from another FOSS > project with minor modifications to make it gEDA specific. Fully agreed. Thanks, Vladimir