X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Original-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
        bh=zILpns0K7DkAnMdSPgJwKGZhuN12/1p7b96edXcOadk=;
        b=hGmzicie7QAYShWGXMOunFBvjRV/tcPWldR0jQ2v6DdbaYVSUMEZzMEbqPbHkxWSSA
         6M2DugHAWhy+gCMNUa2QzQx/R032kyV8Gti4BJZ5Pfm0F+ex+jzIwQQMConqrmDeop93
         V6rZOv+TgkVk3eVIjpNkEDssr8Rgs9tssZgjMYPc4CkYoP1XMghf3ysjuKMJbA+/7obu
         9rLXqVCQFWB2qZMN2Pui9778jIuSzjetZ0zdG4ou1Q8cDM+LqvPKuoOiPK3fCFhzDpGl
         A7u+bf/CnS+/OoYbQYCu+TlxBv63oQPTB8Igscpa8tVI5hS1V1u3Mb+HO1iLECORbm4M
         Fvdg==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.112.54.132 with SMTP id j4mr24852114lbp.84.1442354886596;
 Tue, 15 Sep 2015 15:08:06 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <mt9utu$slt$1@ger.gmane.org>
References: <FXM.JVj9.72U2vXC1esF.1L{0cc AT seznam DOT cz>
	<CAM2RGhQO-9wac22EY5dvjbz91X4MFNNKmNPqDG35FXDwunqcHg AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<mt9utu$slt$1 AT ger DOT gmane DOT org>
Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2015 22:08:06 +0000
Message-ID: <CAM2RGhQxx8yn9yYSNBqXRXN_tgnx06R_usDb7tmAgoPHhO9ZiQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [geda-user] Fwd: gaf improvement - moving of components
From: "Evan Foss (evanfoss AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id t8FM8BuA026722
Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 4:26 PM, Kai-Martin Knaak
<knaak AT iqo DOT uni-hannover DOT de> wrote:
> Evan Foss (evanfoss AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-
> user AT delorie DOT com] wrote:
>
>> Sorry to say this but I don't think you are supposed to join nets like
>> that. I said this back then. Other people cited nondescript technical
>> reasons.
>
> Unless I am mistaken, Vaclav does not want to join nets. He wants gschem
> to not disconnect pins from nets to which they are already connected to. I
> have to say, I completely agree. The tendency of gschem to pull net lines
> into shapes that disconnect from pins is disconnecting (pun intended :-).

I know this is going to sound crass but that is not proper drafting
technique. I am pretty sure I can find references for this fact.

> From a technical point of view, I don't see a fundamental issue. We
> already have the "kissing mode". Given two directly connected pins stay
> connected by a net line which is created on the fly if you pull one of the
> pins away. The behavior Vaclav proposes seems like an extension to this
> concept.

I hate kissing mode but I accept it in the name of compromise. I have
to since removing it would break other peoples art. To me it was
always a bug.

Moving a component off a diagonal line could be made to work but down
through it is fought with problems.

> ---<)kaimartin(>---
> --
> Kai-Martin Knaak                                  tel: +49-511-762-2895
> Universität Hannover, Inst. für Quantenoptik      fax: +49-511-762-2211
> Welfengarten 1, 30167 Hannover           http://www.iqo.uni-hannover.de
> GPG key:    http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?search=Knaak+kmk&op=get
>
>
>



-- 
Home
http://evanfoss.googlepages.com/
Work
http://forge.abcd.harvard.edu/gf/project/epl_engineering/wiki/