X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Original-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=EbuI1h+LU89hOtTUo0UCEtTBiDZ9u/AsuZbPP2nCRiE=; b=X3rvUWlnmVZsY+V/fVQqW/aersu+4O0SI/N+tAf6URZQKe3W09/lDbotkCmPTN4ndm 2TyosdHMKGn+CkK0ugoR41SXe5PJLXiSYrPSNRqQBoPfrv4bYwGiQYdUWd0Gdd90oWnN TmH7MKpdDTx2xpbYR7xEpz7goPMFCn7j4MPJUGHNTO4pc+eLCjvFxHL8t6gIkZbkxUO4 babuC6Vz8CxjxFnPSAydJIqby4SAm/4pqcR/7wtepbk76JqSIgYIxg4OeS/GLGL7lux/ APRk2o+O/LDVAwqKqG78fCEVxocjv2Mpozb39PVEA4WipMiNjYbvRWYlm2pG1lu5VgKE HLdQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.112.64.72 with SMTP id m8mr17488501lbs.41.1442348335213; Tue, 15 Sep 2015 13:18:55 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20150915211705.dae8e216f9a56ae5df4724fa@gmail.com> References: <55F7EE7F DOT 101 AT unige DOT ch> <20150915211705 DOT dae8e216f9a56ae5df4724fa AT gmail DOT com> Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2015 16:18:55 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [geda-user] Happy birthday From: "Evan Foss (evanfoss AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id t8FKJ299015744 Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 3:17 PM, Nicklas Karlsson (nicklas DOT karlsson17 AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com] wrote: >> As a consequence, this average user does not profit from the results of >> what is being discussed on this list: geda-gaf probably looks more or >> less dead to him. Can this be improved? >> >> Jürgen > > Yes as soon as I get a little bit more time. If we had a regular way of checking the stuff on geda symbols and packaging it we could do a lot of sub releases. It would provide real additional functionality, make the project look alive, and it would not break the code in any way. In the old days geda-symbols was it's own package. I was a happier man then. > Nicklas Karlsson > -- Home http://evanfoss.googlepages.com/ Work http://forge.abcd.harvard.edu/gf/project/epl_engineering/wiki/