X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Original-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:mail-followup-to:references :mime-version:content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to :user-agent; bh=o6GMznpSwTcHlKAQ6zVOMxPNc5/Pu5pV/qOuxYhnd7I=; b=KntcrYgrCwQZ6DXQdJFv21MLS52YSIrnF3gtEaQVn+WdOHZhhd1iuuwPO7JBQUqm7N 1F2enNyx6i75AfOiQiV/zSYxvoTIn1NdHugeBmHLYr4RC4i0Lhz3kcf6kHqsCZD0xusg WkMn2a4aaGV8Qx3kD/HYD+jlsznQuqyPLt3ldRfqA2PX8tPzKzLIEYSXDDn308713KUc y/OkX/9m7IxZs2egxSUm35Ec/t+fBpf7+UYTEKr0IzAr+rwIkFmQNhmhMoqsw2TltbMG 5VecAEObM3h9jMIBB5kleQy2coa1hLHr22zrKRpA1miDyA9jM7xjFRwOx84YHUSWNO6g Hkew== X-Received: by 10.112.155.195 with SMTP id vy3mr24767345lbb.9.1442347022088; Tue, 15 Sep 2015 12:57:02 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2015 22:56:59 +0300 From: "Vladimir Zhbanov (vzhbanov AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Subject: Re: PLEASE STOP !!! - Re: [geda-user] Apollon Message-ID: <20150915195659.GA2747@localhost.localdomain> Mail-Followup-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com References: <40057B48-2FD4-4A37-A01E-9344F6C33ADF AT noqsi DOT com> <201509140138 DOT t8E1cqY1011780 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <9YS.JVf3.4bTQ}uiaVeU DOT 1LzcJP AT seznam DOT cz> <55F70229 DOT 8050800 AT xs4all DOT nl> <55F7098E DOT 9030009 AT jump-ing DOT de> <20150914191020 DOT GA3462 AT localhost DOT localdomain> <55F73639 DOT 6060605 AT jump-ing DOT de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 10:03:20PM +0000, Evan Foss (evanfoss AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com] wrote: ... > Agreed. I think what drove people into hiding was the push by users to > hunt them down and demand they add XYZ. Users need to be listened too > but they also have to respect that there are reasons for things not > happening exactly as/when they wish. They were also under a lot of > pressure to merge stuff that was not in keeping with there own vision > of things. > > Having each person who adds a commit accountable for it in the present > release(s) is different than having them maintain it. +1