X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Original-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=mail.ud03.udmedia.de; h=
	subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:mime-version
	:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=beta; bh=
	4BWBXhbYorhxkrDSf0MIjSSo6HXpD3RWRDf2E8T/qCo=; b=uiHjaB6f+okZcA7i
	SvH+SlFZVX0I3o4iVWQAzsJnuoHcb0a9yr5RyI5L4YUaoyTOmMxxOHW0g73L1dtu
	PzgzWhT6GFlbnxlYPqyO60i5yLtloMNpH8duNz+jL7SASzR+R5AjlBRnVxwdq/A8
	NjqJDGvNEsYdPupV1eL5wAo5Pc8=
Subject: Re: [geda-user] pcb's crosshair only half-locating violations
To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
References: <55F000F5 DOT 4090901 AT envinsci DOT co DOT uk> <55F04C94 DOT 4060401 AT jump-ing DOT de>
 <mspv5b$6dr$1 AT ger DOT gmane DOT org>
 <CAC4O8c_kGSiUWqcEtpjT44f2OavB2Z+=n0EQMN7ZWaQ1EZEiEw AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
 <CAOFvGD6penfWAsnm7YN8R3nT9Qzgk9JZ4LDhGYQTQ92vv8xoGA AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
 <55F2BFBD DOT 7010606 AT envinsci DOT co DOT uk> <55F2C43F DOT 7000907 AT jump-ing DOT de>
 <msv461$cng$1 AT ger DOT gmane DOT org> <20150913003447 DOT GB16820 AT localhost DOT localdomain>
 <55F5BB3F DOT 3050608 AT jump-ing DOT de> <201509131831 DOT t8DIVeXi028695 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com>
 <55F5C8FC DOT 1000601 AT jump-ing DOT de> <201509132026 DOT t8DKQJf5000642 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com>
 <55F5E644 DOT 10904 AT jump-ing DOT de> <201509132211 DOT t8DMB9b4004308 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com>
 <mt7j5d$req$1 AT ger DOT gmane DOT org>
From: "Markus Hitter (mah AT jump-ing DOT de) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
Message-ID: <55F7E12B.7070003@jump-ing.de>
Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2015 11:13:15 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/38.2.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <mt7j5d$req$1@ger.gmane.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

Am 15.09.2015 um 00:53 schrieb Kai-Martin Knaak:
> This begs the question, why it was deemed necessary to make 
> approval of the code-of-conduct mandatory in the first place.

Some people behave dirty if they're allowed to. To deal with them it has
to be described what being "nice" means. Asking for clicking a checkbox
just makes sure one can't claim a lack of such common sense rules. In
fact, such rules are everywhere, usually you agree by just using a web
page ("By using this web page you agree to ...").


Am 15.09.2015 um 07:03 schrieb Bert Timmerman:
> I saw and still see no reason to discuss a template text from another
> FOSS project with minor modifications to make it gEDA specific.

There's also no reason to not discuss it. I don't see a problem, either,
but apparently opinions differ.


Markus

-- 
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Dipl. Ing. (FH) Markus Hitter
http://www.jump-ing.de/