X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Original-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=nAoPHFj6j4E+I6hB8/e7WxVHKjloTKrpS5xfid//cv0=; b=L///sVZsi4rMC8BNlUssltpUHkyejDyeFX4LIin1c28otIYKwH2oe2F1aQqo5ILbNl rXaJJK0dPc0hkdlvn107VI3AGioHMKSuAhVc6YDFxOOyFg5u9xhS+6YJcTZF1XE9xDVJ RGYogkMkmSA+3HtDOzzRu01e2kuIpITtS2juhXD4xUlGHEyX2YqLBPZsd1dHQqoNmK1p 9XTD9mKazJ4oFEvYIVUDJMa4aDUcyDwC4uzFRRB5iOPZkN8xdd2lqzPuTtYB96D4MERD xZv2b4eFG64QiosLKvIcwbPBxRr4UgCWchB17zO+T96wzRtvJFpZyAzYsRJqXkGZSps6 uzAg== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.112.198.198 with SMTP id je6mr18262316lbc.31.1442287527910; Mon, 14 Sep 2015 20:25:27 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <20150913140631 DOT 1da1b78d AT jive DOT levalinux DOT org> <201509131529 DOT t8DFTUVS022118 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <201509131824 DOT t8DIOCBc028428 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <201509132031 DOT t8DKVH0P000824 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <201509132148 DOT t8DLmxI6003481 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <201509132300 DOT t8DN0sE6006134 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <7EF3E562-BC7F-4853-B90A-29726FDFEBF6 AT noqsi DOT com> <201509132319 DOT t8DNJBjC006829 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <40057B48-2FD4-4A37-A01E-9344F6C33ADF AT noqsi DOT com> <201509140138 DOT t8E1cqY1011780 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <9YS.JVf3.4bTQ}uiaVeU DOT 1LzcJP AT seznam DOT cz> Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2015 03:25:27 +0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: PLEASE STOP !!! - Re: [geda-user] Apollon From: "Evan Foss (evanfoss AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 2:53 AM, Kai-Martin Knaak wrote: > Evan Foss (evanfoss AT gmail DOT com) [via > geda-user AT delorie DOT com] wrote: > You kind of muddled the layers of indents in your email. This is the only bit in response to me. >> 1. No one talks on the developers email list. (I actually forgot it >> existed and I am on it because there is almost zero traffic.) >> 2. Not everyone who should be is on the developers list is because >> some folks wanted to play gate keeper. This killed off trolling and >> flame wars but it killed off all other discourse for some reason. >> 3. There is already a serious split in motivations between the >> developers and the users. The developers might not like hearing the >> roar of the crowd but the users input needs to be in *some* of this >> discussion. >> 4. Yes after an objective is set it should be migrated over to the >> developers list but I have avoided this because I think a lot of >> people there want to be left alone. >> > 5. moving topics out of reach puts users off. > You loose early adopters and the chance to receive grateful cheers I never said I liked what they did. Like I said it was around that time that I walked away. > ---<)kaimartin(>--- > -- Home http://evanfoss.googlepages.com/ Work http://forge.abcd.harvard.edu/gf/project/epl_engineering/wiki/