X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Virus-Status: Clean
X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.98.4 at av01.lsn.net
Message-ID: <55F73F71.4010300@ecosensory.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2015 16:43:13 -0500
From: John Griessen <john AT ecosensory DOT com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Icedove/31.7.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: [geda-user] off-topic: key bindings
References: <alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 00 DOT 1509131209260 DOT 6924 AT igor2priv> <55F5EFB6 DOT 6050809 AT ecosensory DOT com> <alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 00 DOT 1509140349440 DOT 6924 AT igor2priv>
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1509140349440.6924@igor2priv>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com

On 09/13/2015 08:52 PM, gedau AT igor2 DOT repo DOT hu wrote:
>> I'd rather lose the whole 2 stroke keybinding set in
>> gschem and convert to hotkeys.
>
> Did you notice that I was talking about how to support both, in a compatible, non-switching way?

Sure.  We must have different assumptions about compatible.  I was thinking compatible
meant same keys for many functions.  I was thinking switching meant between gschem and pcb.