X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Original-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=h3yVYYuVfbg2bTAQIYgiGgTY/cCOhhP7O5odcEitAd8=; b=vj/aZxr1YfKmIUHkGxdU7vieC8zt0NHZhcC/lUVzdjDSSz9bjgBWc7uYVIMP4r1I5C lBhwZ3GkBdmBarnSvNBXMphjoVpn9qigd9O9ak8DP1RyvD4NXduJYxOKVt31bZFb6xwf Pm1Vb78A5NWYdUWTA3eqTsa/F4pj21L3dlNqLFTeteehCocpt3DblLBR/NPULMrQFwVm ja5axuiTixaMH2NycZc7nyk3MXgM2R/9XJrEX+DoLW18d+O4e0YADHm3Xvx3U8rGp/oU bX63LSqgnIDcjidxHKWCu0ZvgKCEkDJqXrjhMZcmmwKe/5255kJDV8fZXpjjs1+a8p2M GIaQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.194.21.199 with SMTP id x7mr315653wje.63.1442251940157; Mon, 14 Sep 2015 10:32:20 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4D7DCB5F-5703-4EAB-ADFD-84D7E8A87764@noqsi.com> References: <20150910201416 DOT GG16766 AT fi DOT muni DOT cz> <20150910234211 DOT e718beb2aa1655d22382c8a6 AT gmail DOT com> <201509102207 DOT t8AM7GOh013740 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <20150914131629 DOT GB6914 AT cuci DOT nl> <4D7DCB5F-5703-4EAB-ADFD-84D7E8A87764 AT noqsi DOT com> Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2015 09:32:20 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [geda-user] 5630 LED footprint From: "Britton Kerin (britton DOT kerin AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7b5d95cb91df58051fb872a9 Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk --047d7b5d95cb91df58051fb872a9 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 6:12 AM, John Doty wrote: > > On Sep 14, 2015, at 7:16 AM, Stephen R. van den Berg (srb AT cuci DOT nl) [via > geda-user AT delorie DOT com] wrote: > > > DJ Delorie wrote: > >>> What you want to do is have tons of vias and peel back the mask to > >>> expose more copper to remove the most heat possible. > > > >> It's debatable whether bare (shiny) copper or soldermask can dissipate > >> heat better. I've heard both ways, although I'm partial to the > >> argument that a matte black mask would be the best emitter. > > > > There are some common misconceptions here (as a physicist, I think > > I can speak with some authority; I don't claim to be infallible though)= : > > > > The colour of the material, or even the material itself which is > > on the outside (touching the air) does not matter at all with > > regard to heat radiation. > > For temperatures of a few hundred Kelvin, the relevant wavelengths are in > the infrared, so the visible color is indeed irrelevant. > > > > > The reason why it's called a black-body radiation is not because > > it radiates better when black. No, they call it that because a black > > body does not reflect anything *extra* besides the radiation it already > > emanetes. > > Not true. Emission and absorption are determined by the same function of > wavelength, commonly called =E2=80=9Cemissivity=E2=80=9D. The higher the = emissivity, the > darker the material will appear at the given wavelength. If you had a > material for which this was not true, you could construct a machine that > would violate the second law of thermodynamics. > > > > > Does the material matter then at all? Yes, it does, but only for > > two reasons: > > - If you cover it with soldermask, then the soldermask will carry off > > a little bit more of the heat to neighboring soldermask. To maximise > > this effect it will suffice to simply have no soldermask clearance > > so that the soldermask touches the sides of the copper. > > - Spots which are not covered with soldermask, which are either > > tinned or raw copper will not help in radiating more than > > soldermask covered spots, but they *do* help when receiving > > incoming radiation. I.e. they will reflect radiation coming > > from the outside better than spots covered in soldermask. > > > > So, what is best: > > a. White soldermask. > > b. Soldermask merely touching the sides of the copper (if you > > want to spread the heat to surrounding soldermask as well). > > c. Leaving as much reflective metallic area uncovered. > > d. Making the metallic area as shiny as possible (tinned is better > > than raw copper). > > > > But, to summarise, it will only help reflecting incoming radiation, > > it will not matter one iota for primary heat radiation. > > Not true. Polymers generally have higher emissivity in the infrared than > shiny metal. We exploit this in spacecraft design by covering surfaces we > want to keep cold with =E2=80=9Csilver teflon=E2=80=9D tape. The outer te= flon layer is > highly emissive in the thermal infrared, but transparent to most of the > incoming solar radiation. The silver backing has very low emissivity, so = it > reflects the incoming radiation. > > In space engineering, we sometimes capture this effect by defining an > average emissivity, =CE=B5, over thermal infrared wavelengths, and and av= erage > emissivity, =CE=B1, over the solar spectrum. We call =CE=B1 =E2=80=9Cabso= rptivity=E2=80=9D to > distinguish it from =CE=B5, but the real distinction is just the waveleng= th > range, not the physics. > > When you=E2=80=99re not operating in a vacuum, coating the bare metal wit= h a > polymer will very likely improve radiative cooling. It is, however, an > additional thermal resistance between the metal and the air, so it will > impair conductive and convective cooling. Detailed calculation and > measurement is the only way to resolve this. > I bet one way comes out a lot better than the other though, such that a rule of thumb is possible for most circumstances. I've heard both as well and tried to sort this out in the past, I just took another look: * I just read that convective cooling is the by far the dominant term at normal operating temperatures (with atmosphere). * I think convection is ultimately driven by conduction across the material boundary? * From experience, I think polymer insulates much more than metal So If the above is true I think the polymer would squash the dominant form of dissipation and bare metal is better. --047d7b5d95cb91df58051fb872a9 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable


On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 6:12 AM, John Doty <jpd AT noqsi DOT com> w= rote:

On Sep 14, 2015, at 7:16 AM, Stephen R. van den Berg (srb AT cuci DOT nl) [via ge= da-user AT delorie DOT com] <geda-= user AT delorie DOT com> wrote:

> DJ Delorie wrote:
>>> What you want to do is have tons of vias and peel back the mas= k to
>>> expose more copper to remove the most heat possible.
>
>> It's debatable whether bare (shiny) copper or soldermask can d= issipate
>> heat better.=C2=A0 I've heard both ways, although I'm part= ial to the
>> argument that a matte black mask would be the best emitter.
>
> There are some common misconceptions here (as a physicist, I think
> I can speak with some authority; I don't claim to be infallible th= ough):
>
> The colour of the material, or even the material itself which is
> on the outside (touching the air) does not matter at all with
> regard to heat radiation.

For temperatures of a few hundred Kelvin, the relevant wavelengths a= re in the infrared, so the visible color is indeed irrelevant.

>
> The reason why it's called a black-body radiation is not because > it radiates better when black.=C2=A0 No, they call it that because a b= lack
> body does not reflect anything *extra* besides the radiation it alread= y
> emanetes.

Not true. Emission and absorption are determined by the same functio= n of wavelength, commonly called =E2=80=9Cemissivity=E2=80=9D. The higher t= he emissivity, the darker the material will appear at the given wavelength.= If you had a material for which this was not true, you could construct a m= achine that would violate the second law of thermodynamics.

>
> Does the material matter then at all?=C2=A0 Yes, it does, but only for=
> two reasons:
> - If you cover it with soldermask, then the soldermask will carry off<= br> >=C2=A0 a little bit more of the heat to neighboring soldermask.=C2=A0 T= o maximise
>=C2=A0 this effect it will suffice to simply have no soldermask clearan= ce
>=C2=A0 so that the soldermask touches the sides of the copper.
> - Spots which are not covered with soldermask, which are either
>=C2=A0 tinned or raw copper will not help in radiating more than
>=C2=A0 soldermask covered spots, but they *do* help when receiving
>=C2=A0 incoming radiation.=C2=A0 I.e. they will reflect radiation comin= g
>=C2=A0 from the outside better than spots covered in soldermask.
>
> So, what is best:
> a. White soldermask.
> b. Soldermask merely touching the sides of the copper (if you
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0want to spread the heat to surrounding soldermask as well)= .
> c. Leaving as much reflective metallic area uncovered.
> d. Making the metallic area as shiny as possible (tinned is better
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0than raw copper).
>
> But, to summarise, it will only help reflecting incoming radiation, > it will not matter one iota for primary heat radiation.

Not true. Polymers generally have higher emissivity in the infrared = than shiny metal. We exploit this in spacecraft design by covering surfaces= we want to keep cold with =E2=80=9Csilver teflon=E2=80=9D tape. The outer = teflon layer is highly emissive in the thermal infrared, but transparent to= most of the incoming solar radiation. The silver backing has very low emis= sivity, so it reflects the incoming radiation.

In space engineering, we sometimes capture this effect by defining an avera= ge emissivity, =CE=B5, over thermal infrared wavelengths, and and average e= missivity, =CE=B1, over the solar spectrum. We call =CE=B1 =E2=80=9Cabsorpt= ivity=E2=80=9D to distinguish it from =CE=B5, but the real distinction is j= ust the wavelength range, not the physics.

When you=E2=80=99re not operating in a vacuum, coating the bare metal with = a polymer will very likely improve radiative cooling. It is, however, an ad= ditional thermal resistance between the metal and the air, so it will impai= r conductive and convective cooling. Detailed calculation and measurement i= s the only way to resolve this.

I bet one way comes out a lot better than the other though, such that= a rule of thumb is possible for most circumstances.=C2=A0 I've heard b= oth as well and tried to sort this out in the past, I just took another loo= k:

=C2=A0 * I just read that= convective cooling is the by far the dominant term at normal operating tem= peratures (with atmosphere). =C2=A0

=C2=A0 * I think convection is ultimately driven by conduction acro= ss the material boundary? =C2=A0
=C2=A0
= =C2=A0 * From experience, I think polymer insulates much more than metal

So If the above is true I think the polym= er would squash the dominant form of dissipation and bare metal is better.<= /div>

--047d7b5d95cb91df58051fb872a9--