X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Original-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=vYgwOz5lEguM2AL9pTHP1mqMAAuqtzceH0OsrUtkE4M=; b=kGXCtBFd6lJk30j74HuGB56hfzcq5UKgjSPoLSXAB+9qxbvovLQiFp96vmT6BsfhyD gR4LM+RySY5f1D/JCzpLYEo9Su/dxxI+/3pQcpRaTzEKxe/keveoZe2wmKoyZ+OvTdDG /GdrzgIEDgQ0NCes5ZLmgWNUJxqU3YapqowZ51vl3X86+yfv/Ae1YjpvSEsXM6b8jiHz AEJO0D2/n5QtmCV8O2nUud19evD3nH+E13XbmxKf+Z21+xW4Um1akwjz/D163iK4zW76 J7nslUgO6PXEHeFjD5XMax4ui/HRZ4Gv5pN766X50OPeDwOZEC4jjVtX5cgXvyHqfaI8 gL7g== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.152.120.164 with SMTP id ld4mr13805373lab.84.1442237322020; Mon, 14 Sep 2015 06:28:42 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20150914131629.GB6914@cuci.nl> References: <20150910201416 DOT GG16766 AT fi DOT muni DOT cz> <20150910234211 DOT e718beb2aa1655d22382c8a6 AT gmail DOT com> <201509102207 DOT t8AM7GOh013740 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <20150914131629 DOT GB6914 AT cuci DOT nl> Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2015 09:28:41 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [geda-user] 5630 LED footprint From: "Evan Foss (evanfoss AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 9:16 AM, Stephen R. van den Berg (srb AT cuci DOT nl) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com] wrote: > DJ Delorie wrote: >>> What you want to do is have tons of vias and peel back the mask to >>> expose more copper to remove the most heat possible. > >>It's debatable whether bare (shiny) copper or soldermask can dissipate >>heat better. I've heard both ways, although I'm partial to the >>argument that a matte black mask would be the best emitter. > > There are some common misconceptions here (as a physicist, I think > I can speak with some authority; I don't claim to be infallible though): > > The colour of the material, or even the material itself which is > on the outside (touching the air) does not matter at all with > regard to heat radiation. > > The reason why it's called a black-body radiation is not because > it radiates better when black. No, they call it that because a black > body does not reflect anything *extra* besides the radiation it already > emanetes. > > Does the material matter then at all? Yes, it does, but only for > two reasons: > - If you cover it with soldermask, then the soldermask will carry off > a little bit more of the heat to neighboring soldermask. To maximise > this effect it will suffice to simply have no soldermask clearance > so that the soldermask touches the sides of the copper. > - Spots which are not covered with soldermask, which are either > tinned or raw copper will not help in radiating more than > soldermask covered spots, but they *do* help when receiving > incoming radiation. I.e. they will reflect radiation coming > from the outside better than spots covered in soldermask. > > So, what is best: > a. White soldermask. > b. Soldermask merely touching the sides of the copper (if you > want to spread the heat to surrounding soldermask as well). > c. Leaving as much reflective metallic area uncovered. > d. Making the metallic area as shiny as possible (tinned is better > than raw copper). > > But, to summarise, it will only help reflecting incoming radiation, > it will not matter one iota for primary heat radiation. Thank you that was a satisfying read. > -- > Stephen. -- Home http://evanfoss.googlepages.com/ Work http://forge.abcd.harvard.edu/gf/project/epl_engineering/wiki/