X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Date: Sun, 13 Sep 2015 01:32:04 +0200 (CEST) From: Roland Lutz To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Subject: Re: [geda-user] About reinventing the wheel, and how to avoid it In-Reply-To: <6DA3AD4E-1C13-4BD3-8B8B-57E9680079D3@noqsi.com> Message-ID: References: <960028A6-F16B-4276-B838-E9F0D2959A6F AT noqsi DOT com> <55F32375 DOT 2020505 AT ecosensory DOT com> <201509111941 DOT t8BJfqWl010427 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <201509112020 DOT t8BKKBgI012564 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <201509112058 DOT t8BKwF3b013774 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <6341DF3E-543D-4E36-9B01-6B5B950208C4 AT noqsi DOT com> <20150911230843 DOT GE7946 AT localhost DOT localdomain> <6DA3AD4E-1C13-4BD3-8B8B-57E9680079D3 AT noqsi DOT com> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (DEB 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; format=flowed; charset=US-ASCII Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk On Fri, 11 Sep 2015, John Doty wrote: > Roland has actually reimplemented many (all?) of the standard gnetlist > back ends. I translated the standard gnetlist backends, as well as the other backends I knew about, to Python and updated them to use the new API. I certainly didn't reimplement them; on the contrary, I put much effort into keeping the differences as small as possible (and even went so far as to include the spurious space characters at the end of lines) as I have no way to tell if a different output would still be valid. > The only place we disagree is whether xorn-gnetlist replaces gnetlist or > exists as an alternative. It makes me sad that this is the only point about the netlister which is debated on this list.