X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2015 15:41:52 -0400
Message-Id: <201509111941.t8BJfqWl010427@envy.delorie.com>
From: DJ Delorie <dj AT delorie DOT com>
To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
In-reply-to: <FC9C2933-89CE-44FD-A9EE-CA2721405ACE@noqsi.com> (message from
	John Doty on Fri, 11 Sep 2015 13:37:09 -0600)
Subject: Re: [geda-user] About reinventing the wheel, and how to avoid it
References: <alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 00 DOT 1509111150410 DOT 2482 AT lichen> <B94E2C24-8B63-46FC-A551-9E4B14B817C9 AT noqsi DOT com> <201509111624 DOT t8BGOPYV000685 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <F24E14C9-8427-4688-A27A-1EBE0F669995 AT noqsi DOT com> <201509111732 DOT t8BHWnF7005271 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <960028A6-F16B-4276-B838-E9F0D2959A6F AT noqsi DOT com> <55F32375 DOT 2020505 AT ecosensory DOT com> <FC9C2933-89CE-44FD-A9EE-CA2721405ACE AT noqsi DOT com>
Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk


> You're saying that when the #1 gEDA developer thinks its a good
> thing to prevent users from using the tools in ways the developers
> don't approve of that I shouldn't worry?

For the record, I don't think that.