X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Original-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=mail.ud03.udmedia.de; h= subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:mime-version :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=beta; bh= uEz88hR2SBm0PbITe6uR1cB9L2LV6REmZuYmfia/EiE=; b=cqkQxIEdIsuzPoNe W5/9gPirRfSth+PugUQjsIOfvHcazCedQR6VuGwhfFZpEgJ3mOkm6migMDowZ2hc llmW3aLiHXdyn9/jb9wn/o0ZoZZIx404FkhsnZLaNFw48ZUpg9Xci91cYKQI8aYZ i+tDB8PRHDKH5LN09XoYMr59WHY= Subject: Re: [geda-user] Desired changes To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com References: <55E8773B DOT 9000902 AT jump-ing DOT de> <55E8831A DOT 8050307 AT jump-ing DOT de> <55E891FA DOT 2010509 AT jump-ing DOT de> <201509032030 DOT t83KU1Yq017045 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <55E97A3E DOT 2070402 AT jump-ing DOT de> <69B8B3F4-A6E4-43E9-9055-C63A5D6A3707 AT noqsi DOT com> <55F1890F DOT 4090705 AT ecosensory DOT com> <55F18CCC DOT 7050404 AT jump-ing DOT de> <55F1B518 DOT 8020002 AT jump-ing DOT de> From: "Markus Hitter (mah AT jump-ing DOT de) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" Message-ID: <55F31FDE.9010906@jump-ing.de> Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2015 20:39:26 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk Am 11.09.2015 um 19:50 schrieb Kai-Martin Knaak: > Markus Hitter (mah AT jump-ing DOT de) [via geda- > user AT delorie DOT com] wrote: > >> - Would following this concept lead onto a wrong track, making more >> sane, future proof improvements more difficult? > > Judging from the description on launchpad I'd say, the user interface Totally misinterpreted. Reviewing patches is mostly about code quality. Ever seen such stuff? Code? The kind of text where 5 tiny lines make more sense than 46 discussion emails daily? -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dipl. Ing. (FH) Markus Hitter http://www.jump-ing.de/