X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Original-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=FqMR7NT2oaYtpUnW7DHznjqPNIazTFV/bDEl5O7gVUc=; b=HkezxcwCq9zqKOmXuzuKHkkCBh3DJ8finUvatcBgnmjHqS3L9whWem6mveD3hiTTec 9x+BmTGeVVsYEw9XyOG4sm5fBpSyKqGlNktcPWeZcFzoV92+BYlGFRmsdXSR97Wz1Ap3 EDmnW0l78GxvJ3iDddCWuMqVPelGmcBOMAxvK/Z0gkG7Vpnbr/B3ZQGbf6GrFHXZLJaS Fo1sIfzUTyPTr3xOJYqky7rPfb/n5IaAX/1YdYvzHRb4lyY17wlKDLGoGOL54Xs3lwfP JOBPZBqp6+WFfeixYzXXKTk4sjXpcrTyJ3RETtosLQsblmMO8rlHBt/8vBein6R5PTHK /FzA== X-Received: by 10.180.8.200 with SMTP id t8mr58996187wia.34.1441826423805; Wed, 09 Sep 2015 12:20:23 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2015 21:20:22 +0200 From: "Nicklas Karlsson (nicklas DOT karlsson17 AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Subject: Re: [geda-user] New experimental netlist features Message-Id: <20150909212022.e0d7ed9a6eac110f71c1787c@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <201509091721.t89HL4iS020376@envy.delorie.com> References: <20150908233235 DOT b6cde3ec6c40bf235a7a1df8 AT gmail DOT com> <201509082144 DOT t88LiOXW007712 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <201509082355 DOT t88NtdSM012317 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <201509091721 DOT t89HL4iS020376 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.5.0beta1 (GTK+ 2.24.25; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk On Wed, 9 Sep 2015 13:21:04 -0400 DJ Delorie wrote: > > > Do you have any suggestion for a less ambiguous syntax? > > We resolve ambiguity by documenting what we expect. > > The question is, which syntax makes the most sense for us - what would > present the "least surprise" to the user? > > I think in this case, choosing between: > > * Pascal > * Ada > * An obscure GCC extension[*] > * Verilog * VHDL