X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Virus-Status: Clean
X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.98.4 at av02.lsn.net
Message-ID: <55F06D12.102@ecosensory.com>
Date: Wed, 09 Sep 2015 12:32:02 -0500
From: John Griessen <john AT ecosensory DOT com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Icedove/31.7.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: [geda-user] New experimental netlist features
References: <alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 11 DOT 1509031356150 DOT 13201 AT nimbus>,<msi77b$6rr$1 AT ger DOT gmane DOT org>,<alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 00 DOT 1509082036590 DOT 3066 AT lichen> <20150908233235 DOT b6cde3ec6c40bf235a7a1df8 AT gmail DOT com>,<201509082144 DOT t88LiOXW007712 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <DUB125-W30B605E4BCBF749E33087DC6530 AT phx DOT gbl> <201509082355 DOT t88NtdSM012317 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 00 DOT 1509091133300 DOT 2682 AT lichen> <201509091721 DOT t89HL4iS020376 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com>
In-Reply-To: <201509091721.t89HL4iS020376@envy.delorie.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com

On 09/09/2015 12:21 PM, DJ Delorie wrote:
> The question is, which syntax makes the most sense for us - what would
> present the "least surprise" to the user?


Verilog.