X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Original-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=5fhJnNcJQqpJv4m87ytOJCcY5h5nP8/5lbLmOirKaiQ=; b=RTeVCcYbhYybiTz81ZjRIrHzaUxeXuppSQdRB98xuLHlmktpw/Yz2Pab/1m/zrBU3S dkzd6+E5lKvTlXiqlj/X4WbJRPIo6z/TrrlhzJyxqlvadxONPdxBQOjs+d2wiYkGkZGc o4Zw4kQpFWNmG72ZdSj0vACODufSsgoNa5AgziNdAmvNz7vsfRitu2GRe6v00UEURmxn oWdKfbSfHPiwhJ5IgW7ijC0/+WmYGGZgBHN9S8C/zNsF3s89qcbi31A8zVOzKWWFsjoM epxVsJ83SQKw94hmwA/eSP2E3+AmI1kEMo+i8098mqVyVaLFdBWsKqOoo66KpIgy0bdx sqSA== X-Received: by 10.180.100.161 with SMTP id ez1mr45128063wib.60.1441791431121; Wed, 09 Sep 2015 02:37:11 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2015 11:37:06 +0200 From: "Nicklas Karlsson (nicklas DOT karlsson17 AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Subject: Re: [geda-user] [OT] looking for a PADS layout person (GERBER --> PCB) Message-Id: <20150909113706.30b44e944c08b590f146d9f2@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: References: <1509040703 DOT AA09605 AT ivan DOT Harhan DOT ORG> <20150904192626 DOT e7e840eed7bf8e2e3e418f79 AT gmail DOT com> <20150909092512 DOT b2354e50a1028463c8f819bd AT gmail DOT com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.5.0beta1 (GTK+ 2.24.25; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk > Eagle and Diptrace paint pads with strokes, which is not compliant with the > standard, making it hard to turn them back into a simple pad. > > PCB seems to use polygons for square pads, rather than flashed apertures, > which is not compliant with the standard either, but these are equilateral > so identifying them as simple pads is not too hard. What do you think about adding "flashed apertures" instead of "square pads" to the pcb todo or whish list to make it comply with the standard? Maybe I could even look into it myself some day.