X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Original-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:mime-version
         :content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
        bh=zTCT3ZtGZlnmN9Ft+15eV5bbhKVcud1NUyDCKBvq6mE=;
        b=Md5Yh1/OoOEyCu69xDbEjUvtIPRZYGZqY2BV2O0Fs3DuDwNZx6zyXMNeyZx6pKe1MX
         Y8unyOERteuQ9eNempqb0qVwsNg3IkmIRDgbqV2rC7J9EQtojCdNwHD9WLYnStmMH11D
         Y+aHL/n8pjDgES1JTjh8/HxrZDziRSJY6QXrDrStMSLDCtRqZ7PJfHdiVv7pDnqiKj9h
         B7w2OQxuqkVwzk++Q8sXKNYevvnNFriuLItR6YIw/QEGoJGlc4dH3H5oXsiUg6tPuDC6
         rHFgRDBK48oK03QZqOh9bDeJCIiJzq8YBXxJ+vaox7hQ6gFb7p+KX3crJqi8f5ep3QWZ
         pFkQ==
X-Received: by 10.194.191.164 with SMTP id gz4mr55475566wjc.21.1441784070302;
        Wed, 09 Sep 2015 00:34:30 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2015 09:34:28 +0200
From: "Nicklas Karlsson (nicklas DOT karlsson17 AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: [geda-user] New experimental netlist features
Message-Id: <20150909093428.75793e5d787d991be26fa2d6@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <201509082144.t88LiOXW007712@envy.delorie.com>
References: <alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 11 DOT 1509031356150 DOT 13201 AT nimbus>
	<msi77b$6rr$1 AT ger DOT gmane DOT org>
	<alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 00 DOT 1509082036590 DOT 3066 AT lichen>
	<20150908233235 DOT b6cde3ec6c40bf235a7a1df8 AT gmail DOT com>
	<201509082144 DOT t88LiOXW007712 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com>
X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.5.0beta1 (GTK+ 2.24.25; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

> > For C/C++ switch case "0 ... 7" could be used for ranges
> 
> I think that's a GNU extension, though, and C and C++ differed in
> syntax.  Not sure if they resolved that (let's hope so).

That's correct "0 ... 7" is a GNU extenstion to C/C++. "0 .. 7" is however standard in ADA.