X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Original-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:mime-version
         :content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
        bh=sP3hnNRafI4FF04rDpa/GuTcTxBN1wcMngN/Qf+bZMU=;
        b=aV7LJe/Z6GsMsioxVOZIuYBvIQvrUStLDS+Xqed72Ii/UxSI0ntHCOGLuy+I1wpgB3
         QZlvBs5OyVbGQYon5g6bkfzQhlQHPu11kChm50ok4fCRSG7aiFJES6gwl5rneOKHb22g
         cNehXKMvWuWTVZgaqsgDhcn7zmpIRtslM3HihYRVt+aRQtOe+g1OWSinYmmZfakB2dfr
         Xnh+UKMnuJEqz64y6f3gNpUDSRxJC5KjVAAiUryR3vj+GiH2neseyJ6E8RsuBVvCKlQD
         aGT1HVoP0ptWGXoY9QvEMAv1ndCGPHR9zgEw5cJWdv5j2tW6w2enWOuO28sg/SUXqpaP
         y0Pg==
X-Received: by 10.180.92.225 with SMTP id cp1mr53067963wib.2.1441783864000;
        Wed, 09 Sep 2015 00:31:04 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2015 09:31:02 +0200
From: "Nicklas Karlsson (nicklas DOT karlsson17 AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: [geda-user] Desired changes
 (was:"New experimental netlist features")
Message-Id: <20150909093102.bad96542a878c8bce15eb5f8@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <2F1C1D79-3C24-4513-BDD8-1C57E0617113@noqsi.com>
References: <alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 11 DOT 1509031356150 DOT 13201 AT nimbus>
	<201509032030 DOT t83KU1Yq017045 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com>
	<55E97A3E DOT 2070402 AT jump-ing DOT de>
	<69B8B3F4-A6E4-43E9-9055-C63A5D6A3707 AT noqsi DOT com>
	<msfjma$340$1 AT ger DOT gmane DOT org>
	<alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 00 DOT 1509060518220 DOT 6924 AT igor2priv>
	<msidqe$66h$1 AT ger DOT gmane DOT org>
	<D2219618-B906-432B-B11A-C108DA9FCBF9 AT noqsi DOT com>
	<CAOP4iL3JkWC4Nuw8vDOBDR4Zk4OD2xwrMwHXp-ZihPom5Wmfwg AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<43CA04C5-47B7-4DA4-8005-3A2D4E9D0E47 AT noqsi DOT com>
	<20150908162514 DOT 43142577ec15e48c50950a18 AT gmail DOT com>
	<CD93E147-F22E-4CA2-9793-FAAA5558486D AT noqsi DOT com>
	<20150908182504 DOT 196a11571c68bc63ef8e4c27 AT gmail DOT com>
	<11875D68-7D82-48AB-8850-C5C3BCCF64EC AT noqsi DOT com>
	<20150908193308 DOT 9668c04bfb9b5a501f9c11a2 AT gmail DOT com>
	<E0A54A3A-F1AC-47F4-9718-912C70B3B2F5 AT noqsi DOT com>
	<20150908211310.2a3de7efe3e37! 61fcab458d5 AT gmail DOT com>
	<E12B2B08-085A-4263-9B4C-C293A0275746 AT noqsi DOT com>
	<20150908231242.75cc796752f53d329!
 8631084 AT gmail DOT com>
	<2F1C1D79-3C24-4513-BDD8-1C57E0617113 AT noqsi DOT com>
X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.5.0beta1 (GTK+ 2.24.25; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

> For manufacturer part numbers, in big projects, I do a join of the BOM to a database that relates part specs to part numbers. There are sometimes two such databases, as prototype and production parts are different.

This one of the things I have been thinking about for a long time, it seems really great!

There I worked before manufacturer part number had to be known then adding the component. As soon as a number changed all documents had to be updated and this was horrible.