X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=MLexauVYQlNz2tnSFXHr8IaLedGS8o9mWQm+9zgYT8Y=; b=KHpgPpBIEcxPzf+XygPtaTbQg37H8zQGaJrFJwgpC8xhSfQ/BdWkkV7f3TL2eodEvm Qc5T+Ivai6+QFsVmVSU+sZQSceJ6lwRGb+3O57VfKhIek2cAaPnTXGfdz+Jyl4f0mz/t zCirxdbcKx6c2A0HyLMRj+OjuQ/pF8N3jHMNtVJu2+o4n+najRN/cGHxIYI3TGF/VlTY ybqVBsjf8CXWLzWGnUAa8YY6yH2VcQwMSOnAW3iZONrx7d5Twflw2DFvWeRY8fjul45P dVvq4ysoh8lVYbifTPcytTf487mLnnd7aIEKt9CkRTvqBygTxJLDC1pbTH8hYNvyopF7 edxw== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlAEuylc0R2mC+K0ECKngiM+5KgssiOv5mgRas8j2p20nwhO8Do7rfTYqn5MyDHqxus8DhW MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.107.163.130 with SMTP id m124mr36201023ioe.85.1441705078396; Tue, 08 Sep 2015 02:37:58 -0700 (PDT) X-Originating-IP: [62.221.5.234] In-Reply-To: References: Date: Tue, 8 Sep 2015 10:37:58 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [geda-user] gschem bugreport: groff From: Gareth Edwards To: "geda-user AT delorie DOT com" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk On 8 September 2015 at 08:47, wrote:> > I think if groff is essential for making gschem and change in groff > installation requires a rerunning ./configure, then a missing groff should > be a fatal error during configuration. Else we could just notice the user > that some documentation couldn't be compiled and go on compiling the rest. > Duplicate of https://bugs.launchpad.net/geda/+bug/795654 I think. /gde