X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Original-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=tVaYgcn9MdvWIMzGlgGWSONUZjNCG9M0OS3J+SAzIAU=; b=qKz2iXGjl0+X4kvlxSWORmdtVdNbxTm3T2Wp29y+wQmNuZ2OcXtWC4ij8W/X1ln/LR FaHrtVkcl5iYwqn83wb97mRFM3ZjClc+mbSH3Id2Q2BXnrAtRI2j7rGve4n1RqfQAZXg N3l1LrHiY/2qdosPVx3dkOIMAa1VW1XtOMvFaTm5JrU0dnQ+fJSaPuHewRPq+DpwajhI SC3WEFNXhZySbKVnyyDXY4XHUwOTvD1PUnai0b7KksxPM8UqdO2ZcJ09n/8RXiqXNXez v0B/8UCBiQqWMpgs9BQWzhxPL2N5rTW/4aVGJaHAq1FuSXtPm7FgsIvmeghxmVx3aWvO xkeg== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.112.64.7 with SMTP id k7mr15309671lbs.31.1441596738779; Sun, 06 Sep 2015 20:32:18 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20150906201250.GC3117@localhost.localdomain> References: <55E9BD63 DOT 8070407 AT jump-ing DOT de> <201509051930 DOT t85JUlTh019874 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <20150905210158 DOT GC7185 AT localhost DOT localdomain> <201509052107 DOT t85L7sHL024299 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <20150905213959 DOT GE7185 AT localhost DOT localdomain> <20150906083156 DOT GD2637 AT localhost DOT localdomain> <201509061944 DOT t86JiX4c011282 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <20150906201250 DOT GC3117 AT localhost DOT localdomain> Date: Mon, 7 Sep 2015 03:32:18 +0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [geda-user] New experimental netlist features From: "Evan Foss (evanfoss AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk On Sun, Sep 6, 2015 at 8:12 PM, Vladimir Zhbanov (vzhbanov AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com] wrote: > On Sun, Sep 06, 2015 at 03:44:33PM -0400, DJ Delorie wrote: >> >> > To be fair we have the dev list where people should be taking ideas >> > and finding out how likely they are to get pushed into the mainline if >> > they are implemented. >> >> To be even more fair, that list is essentially just me now. > > To be fair, not only you. Some (many) developers prefer to answer > questions privately, for some reason (I don't know why). But yes, you, > Peter Brett, Edward and Bert are those who answered my questions in the > list last time. Thank you all. (And sorry if I've just didn't understood > properly what you're meaning because of my English knowledge, and > somehow misinterpreted your words.) And this is part of our already existing community that I hope will recover after the next release happens. >> Which is why I've been encouraging folks to "own" the code, make >> decisions for themselves, and push changes to master. Hopefully we'll >> find (or grow) some new leadership to replace the old. > > The question is, what we'll do with an existing state. Just nobody is > answering my question about release plans. You are right to push for this. > Cheers, > Vladimir -- Home http://evanfoss.googlepages.com/ Work http://forge.abcd.harvard.edu/gf/project/epl_engineering/wiki/