X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Original-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=rbGEu8fvIJK1j89hRf5J1gF9H5sSa/Vf/d3qzIW1i6E=; b=w7d89ryMpmuM/frlBFqTjsJLuHXjSwh5CyQHYCiE7qqmaoklNlCUf2o2XAMsGm7wo8 EbjMrd1D+2DuKJ910D1x3RnJVDJmX9GRGfIk5gqdAVOcJHeoa1w6lJCFJBUjg3eC9nwn uVtdwuaQqJu8j9ntEezVPFwGgoZFVkUSa+nva69PiLBLYJI1xGPeAet5KuaxkdgQl2Zs EQ8EF2WIrw/ypxtavtDBP9KVu/Rdd9gp+0P9MlxcKgbsKceRhlTq5yfQoZ8lE5hYWGi0 /ui/4bhq+Wh0y3a7rnikRpHW2xzI/PBPNBrHXkXdzUYbznVWUeB+OejJRFeb8c/lUS36 lsjA== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.152.22.73 with SMTP id b9mr3793834laf.83.1441581749542; Sun, 06 Sep 2015 16:22:29 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <55E97A3E DOT 2070402 AT jump-ing DOT de> <69B8B3F4-A6E4-43E9-9055-C63A5D6A3707 AT noqsi DOT com> <55E9BD63 DOT 8070407 AT jump-ing DOT de> <201509051930 DOT t85JUlTh019874 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <20150905210158 DOT GC7185 AT localhost DOT localdomain> <201509052107 DOT t85L7sHL024299 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <20150905213959 DOT GE7185 AT localhost DOT localdomain> <20150906073953 DOT GB2637 AT localhost DOT localdomain> Date: Sun, 6 Sep 2015 23:22:29 +0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [geda-user] New experimental netlist features From: "Evan Foss (evanfoss AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk On Sun, Sep 6, 2015 at 8:36 PM, Kai-Martin Knaak wrote: > Evan Foss (evanfoss AT gmail DOT com) [via > geda-user AT delorie DOT com] wrote: > >> And some >>> new developers just excuse their fear/reluctance to make code more >>> accurate with the thesis that the major developers are >>> cruel/arrogant etc. >> >> I agree with that statement. > > I don't agree with any vague statements on "some new developers". > Either speak up and name specific persons and instances. Or keep your > fingers calm and accept the situation as it is. Because what we need here is to go from talking about over all issues to out out right animosity? > >> The current bout of hostility has an >> intergenerational tone to it. > > Let's say it this way: The current openness differs drastically from > what I witnessed for the most part of the last ten years. I don't even know what to make of this. >> Perhaps before I get too far into libgeda+gpmi I should ask the dev >> list what they think should happen? > > Is there an (active) dev list? > The project documentation suggests, there is not: > http://wiki.geda-project.org/geda:mailinglists It depends on how you define active. > ---<)kaimartin(>--- > -- Home http://evanfoss.googlepages.com/ Work http://forge.abcd.harvard.edu/gf/project/epl_engineering/wiki/