X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com From: Kai-Martin Knaak Subject: Re: [geda-user] New experimental netlist features Date: Sun, 06 Sep 2015 22:36:47 +0200 Lines: 30 Message-ID: References: <55E97A3E DOT 2070402 AT jump-ing DOT de> <69B8B3F4-A6E4-43E9-9055-C63A5D6A3707 AT noqsi DOT com> <55E9BD63 DOT 8070407 AT jump-ing DOT de> <201509051930 DOT t85JUlTh019874 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <20150905210158 DOT GC7185 AT localhost DOT localdomain> <201509052107 DOT t85L7sHL024299 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <20150905213959 DOT GE7185 AT localhost DOT localdomain> <20150906073953 DOT GB2637 AT localhost DOT localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit X-Complaints-To: usenet AT ger DOT gmane DOT org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: a89-182-144-163.net-htp.de User-Agent: KNode/4.14.1 Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Evan Foss (evanfoss AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com] wrote: > And some >> new developers just excuse their fear/reluctance to make code more >> accurate with the thesis that the major developers are >> cruel/arrogant etc. > > I agree with that statement. I don't agree with any vague statements on "some new developers". Either speak up and name specific persons and instances. Or keep your fingers calm and accept the situation as it is. > The current bout of hostility has an > intergenerational tone to it. Let's say it this way: The current openness differs drastically from what I witnessed for the most part of the last ten years. > Perhaps before I get too far into libgeda+gpmi I should ask the dev > list what they think should happen? Is there an (active) dev list? The project documentation suggests, there is not: http://wiki.geda-project.org/geda:mailinglists ---<)kaimartin(>---