X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Original-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:mail-followup-to:references :mime-version:content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to :user-agent; bh=uNV26c5+WNvcgZtwFzT3eMTMuzwN3UqWy38uRep6il4=; b=brSKKa6Q1F42dQ3ozvEMisDz6uWE3nA6rsUzL8tEe6RdLlwLvCMWJHiumhEL9YtQ9M /9cNfviER8aC8bf4kAk3OFFmf3VjtNdfXJ3NZZWvbfRTJ9ZC30rczWsBvz7YyFC5uTbi 7bkHjh3C/BEld3w60z/V5w02/sfD+QQ4y0LIYUVJUlQ2Z9SyFDWP22fdUCkdKac+HFIt x0LdV7VnD8OuRA/49mGRkpTadWSqeLTm5ehW0b9z7qQlWpw9slDx+SNdfKMxm0HJSN/O aBD5VyZaNYumPHj5TwprGjKzLvmdWiBMM9S4UbDVE4MjZy89igbrKboy2ZxQykhFYY0c Z8oA== X-Received: by 10.152.7.7 with SMTP id f7mr13842673laa.62.1441570372950; Sun, 06 Sep 2015 13:12:52 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sun, 6 Sep 2015 23:12:50 +0300 From: "Vladimir Zhbanov (vzhbanov AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Subject: Re: [geda-user] New experimental netlist features Message-ID: <20150906201250.GC3117@localhost.localdomain> Mail-Followup-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com References: <55E9BD63 DOT 8070407 AT jump-ing DOT de> <201509051930 DOT t85JUlTh019874 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <20150905210158 DOT GC7185 AT localhost DOT localdomain> <201509052107 DOT t85L7sHL024299 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <20150905213959 DOT GE7185 AT localhost DOT localdomain> <20150906083156 DOT GD2637 AT localhost DOT localdomain> <201509061944 DOT t86JiX4c011282 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <201509061944.t86JiX4c011282@envy.delorie.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk On Sun, Sep 06, 2015 at 03:44:33PM -0400, DJ Delorie wrote: > > > To be fair we have the dev list where people should be taking ideas > > and finding out how likely they are to get pushed into the mainline if > > they are implemented. > > To be even more fair, that list is essentially just me now. To be fair, not only you. Some (many) developers prefer to answer questions privately, for some reason (I don't know why). But yes, you, Peter Brett, Edward and Bert are those who answered my questions in the list last time. Thank you all. (And sorry if I've just didn't understood properly what you're meaning because of my English knowledge, and somehow misinterpreted your words.) > > Which is why I've been encouraging folks to "own" the code, make > decisions for themselves, and push changes to master. Hopefully we'll > find (or grow) some new leadership to replace the old. The question is, what we'll do with an existing state. Just nobody is answering my question about release plans. Cheers, Vladimir