X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Original-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=FJafpMZ817oHpgAXOQcgVS5v8m3Dm3hWUNidMFSiQ0c=; b=HlCJG1SIDh2YXT2bkgyqn/Lp4wJEtg20xEj/UjqSTPTd9De0ExIsKbrAcCHeHi/IZ+ c1Yv4QSHnfsVkzj0ufpo0+c/r+DePZdqKacIpq4PWt7qfRdGvHdHIgHRmU2WddkcGFec n6Fm7EoNW+hTGBKOjA4qRms3gfPnd+P07CwU0n5Zv4/dL1Y/3af/WCKH9HhvnBkoyr2S xq4CjMqHqwG+8SF3POcsVaPJ3hxzLljP90hYFEqYwKCJX+aPOYUNKZq3pclNpybQi3pw U9igTUw42CYRwCRK4UpVrk4h5U70JpG22Gvsu2QSGdG/ogSS565wik4hPE1g5k+jQnD7 C++g== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.152.9.9 with SMTP id v9mr6144136laa.111.1441416953689; Fri, 04 Sep 2015 18:35:53 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <55E9EEEE.5020804@jump-ing.de> References: <55E9EEEE DOT 5020804 AT jump-ing DOT de> Date: Fri, 4 Sep 2015 19:35:53 -0600 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [geda-user] clearances for auto-routed traces with copper pours From: "Dave Williams (dave DOT williams DOT lists AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=089e014951267f7ba3051ef609cc Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk --089e014951267f7ba3051ef609cc Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Markus Yes, I will upload a demo PCB to bug tracker that shows the issue. Meanwhile, when I '> grep Line xxx.pcb' I get 4 different "Line" type outputs. Here are 4 examples. 1) Line[5.6700mm 7.7300mm 5.6700mm 8.8500mm 10.00mil 20.00mil "clearline"] 2) Line[16.3500mm 30.2100mm 16.2650mm 30.2950mm 10.00mil 20.00mil ""] 3) Line[11.0000mm 45.0180mm 11.0000mm 49.8255mm 10.00mil 20.00mil "auto"] 4) Line[36.0000mm 0.0000 36.0000mm 55.9700mm 10.00mil 20.00mil "clearline,selected"] Are you saying that I will not get plane clearance for the 3) example above because the attribute "clearline" is not set? IOW, if 3) was "LIne[......,"auto,clearline"] then I would have obtained DRC clearance from the copper plane? Thanks, Dave On Fri, Sep 4, 2015 at 1:20 PM, Markus Hitter (mah AT jump-ing DOT de) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com] wrote: > Am 04.09.2015 um 21:03 schrieb Dave Williams > (dave DOT williams DOT lists AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]: > > I have been assuming that the > > auto-router enforces the same DRC clearance settings, as with manual > > routing. > > This is a reasonable expectation. Can you create a demonstation PCB and > upload it together with the text of your mail to the bug tracker? > > https://bugs.launchpad.net/pcb > > First check I'd do is to look into the .pcb file with a text editor > wether the "clearline" flag is set for these autorouted tracks. > > > Thanks, > Markus > > -- > - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - > Dipl. Ing. (FH) Markus Hitter > http://www.jump-ing.de/ > --089e014951267f7ba3051ef609cc Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Markus

Yes, I will upload a demo PCB to bug tr= acker that shows the issue.

<= div class=3D"gmail_extra">Meanwhile, when I '> grep Line=C2=A0 xxx.p= cb' I get 4 different "Line" type outputs.=C2=A0
Here are= 4 examples.

1) Line[5.6700mm 7.7300mm 5.6700mm 8.8500mm 10.00mil 2= 0.00mil "clearline"]
2) Line[16.3500mm 30.2100mm 16.2650mm 30.= 2950mm 10.00mil 20.00mil ""]
3) Line[11.0000mm 45.0180mm 11.00= 00mm 49.8255mm 10.00mil 20.00mil "auto"]
4) Line[36.0000mm 0.0= 000 36.0000mm 55.9700mm 10.00mil 20.00mil "clearline,selected"]
Are you saying that I will not get p= lane clearance for the 3) example above because
the attribute "clearline" is not set?=C2=A0 IOW, if 3) w= as "LIne[......,"auto,clearline"] then I would have obtained= DRC clearance from the copper plane?

Thanks,
Dave =C2=A0

On Fri, Sep 4, 2015 at = 1:20 PM, Markus Hitter (mah AT jump-ing DOT de<= /a>) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com] <geda-user AT delorie DOT com> wrote:
Am 04.09.2015 um 21:03 schrieb Dave Willia= ms
(dave DOT williams DOT lists AT gmail= .com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT c= om]:
> I have been assuming that the
> auto-router enforces the same DRC clearance settings, as with manual > routing.

This is a reasonable expectation. Can you create a demonstation PCB = and
upload it together with the text of your mail to the bug tracker?

=C2=A0https://bugs.launchpad.net/pcb

First check I'd do is to look into the .pcb file with a text editor
wether the "clearline" flag is set for these autorouted tracks.

Thanks,
Markus

--
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Dipl. Ing. (FH) Markus Hitter
ht= tp://www.jump-ing.de/

--089e014951267f7ba3051ef609cc--