X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Original-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=ht9TKwXY15ANVzRihaCJaTLs96coM7Qgi/28n9h2nsk=; b=xrp+571CW1daoNjTvOIBdROhEVwVUvwjhDXcQp+7kZu2L2DLEBZZnXZSXU5tfQZdnE 1jNFabk9CrMQ4iBalcmogS3WJ2lb7NJCKC2hCyqDrVYln8YTDzqywyE72HCkGj5wiz4T I7tjNMzeL6XkT7r/49lwA4XRlOnhGhda20Wua4xBfhJtF59Y6q2dEzRezqrGRcDcmAEq RNMWS8qhqNDnqvub4p89+fSMqUs1flo48XPdu0EbQ3bcyLJ35gqFuV+6tPXr7arMmKku TXENGITmEZCsk0tPcjrhHSxzMal5/W+syjple8ucCNXOpzoMO3pJsHLj7d4f28rGICLM 828w== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.66.243.225 with SMTP id xb1mr10992575pac.78.1441390704138; Fri, 04 Sep 2015 11:18:24 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <55E8773B DOT 9000902 AT jump-ing DOT de> <55E8831A DOT 8050307 AT jump-ing DOT de> <55E891FA DOT 2010509 AT jump-ing DOT de> <201509032030 DOT t83KU1Yq017045 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <55E97A3E DOT 2070402 AT jump-ing DOT de> <69B8B3F4-A6E4-43E9-9055-C63A5D6A3707 AT noqsi DOT com> <55E9BD63 DOT 8070407 AT jump-ing DOT de> Date: Fri, 4 Sep 2015 14:18:23 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [geda-user] New experimental netlist features From: "Evan Foss (evanfoss AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id t84IITOd005681 Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk On Fri, Sep 4, 2015 at 12:11 PM, John Doty wrote: > > On Sep 4, 2015, at 9:48 AM, Markus Hitter (mah AT jump-ing DOT de) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com] wrote: > >> Am 04.09.2015 um 17:30 schrieb Evan Foss (evanfoss AT gmail DOT com) [via >> geda-user AT delorie DOT com]: >>> Users should have a choice between >>> 1. kicad, a GUI centric integrated tool that has limited workflows but >>> intuitive control >> >> OK, gEDA has to be intentionally hard to use to not dent into KiCAd >> business. > > No, gEDA has to emphasize its strengths to avoid losing to KiCAD. Trying to compete with KiCAD is folly. We can do so many things they can’t, but a limited tool will always beat a flexible kit at integration. Exactly. > John Doty Noqsi Aerospace, Ltd. > http://www.noqsi.com/ > jpd AT noqsi DOT com > > > -- Home http://evanfoss.googlepages.com/ Work http://forge.abcd.harvard.edu/gf/project/epl_engineering/wiki/